Live data from Hacker News

WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

namecheap.com

111–120 of 146 posts

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you put it that way, I nod in agreement. But at the same time, I reflect upon the days of the phone book, which most people on this board likely never knew. Your phone number and address would be listed by the phone company as part of your phone number subscription - an unlisted number would cost you more. While times of change, and the searchability of the digital world does raise some other concerns, I still w…

Not everyone has a PO Box, they cost actual real money. Not everyone has a public/business phone number, those cost actual real money. Requiring another phone number and a PO Box means domains go from costing $10/year to $250/year. You can allow people to contact an owner without giving out their information. Craigslist does it.

Not everyone has a domain name, they cost actual real money.

The question comes down to: is owning a domain like owning a computer (a commodity)? Or is owning a domain more akin to owning a phone (landline), or real estate, or a business?

If the former, privacy should generally be assumed by default. If the latter, I think it's worth questioning whether it should be.

To your point, the price doesn't escalate to $250/yr. It escalates to $10/year plus ~$2-5/yr for privacy protection. That's what we've been talking about this whole time - SHOULD you have to pay a premium for an "unlisted number"?

Luckily for those concerned with privacy, companies like Namecheap, Google, Namesilo, and a few others are now offering this by default, making that discussion irrelevant.

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#113

Can someone explain in more detail why they aren't able why they aren't able to cover certain TLDs (including several falling under GDPR in the EU)? Their FAQ says: "Due to registry restrictions, WhoisGuard cannot be used with .asia, .ca, .cn, .uk, .co.uk, .de, .eu, .in, .id, .me, .uk, .nu, .li, .ch, .fr, .sg, .com.sg, .org.uk, .us, .es, .com.es, .nom.es, .org.es, .com.au, .net.au, .paris, .vote, .voto, .xn--3ds443g,…

In the case of most of those, it's simply unnecessary. For instance, for EU ccTLDs, none of them reveal anything more than the most basic information in Whois for private individuals owing to the DPD (and its successor, the GDPR). For others, as people have noted, you need to prove residency. This is pretty common with ccTLDs who aren't subject to ICANN regulation, even outside of the EU.

I can't recall the .vote/.voto policies (haven't work for a registrar in a year), nor those for .asia.

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#114
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never heard of them. How come they're 30-50% cheaper than anyone else? What's the catch?

Nothing. I've been using namesilo for years and no problems at all.

I'm asking because domain registration is a very competitive business, so profit margins should be thin. In such a market a company that sells the exact same product for half the price is pretty unexpected.

So is the market not as competitive as it looks, or is there something else going on?

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#115

Ugh, leave it to Namecheap to fuck up extremely simple UX. Instead of just giving me a toggle in the domain settings, I have to add WhoisGuard to my cart, once per domain (for the tens of domains I own), then go and select "10 years" in the purchasing screen (and wait for the entire page to reload) once for each domain, and then go through the entire checkout process to pay $0. Why not just let me click a single butt…

This is coming on our next iteration and WhoisGuard will simply be feature in the future.

And while you're at it, I hope you'll automatically post account credits to pending charges. Previously, I've had to go through an obscure laborious process to apply credits Namecheap gave me. If you don't want people to use their account credits, don't offer them.

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you put it that way, I nod in agreement. But at the same time, I reflect upon the days of the phone book, which most people on this board likely never knew. Your phone number and address would be listed by the phone company as part of your phone number subscription - an unlisted number would cost you more. While times of change, and the searchability of the digital world does raise some other concerns, I still w…

Not everyone has a PO Box, they cost actual real money. Not everyone has a public/business phone number, those cost actual real money. Requiring another phone number and a PO Box means domains go from costing $10/year to $250/year. You can allow people to contact an owner without giving out their information. Craigslist does it.

> Not everyone has a public/business phone number, those cost actual real money

No. Google Voice numbers are free, I use one as the throwaway phone number for my personal domains.

https://www.google.com/voice

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#117

Can someone explain in more detail why they aren't able why they aren't able to cover certain TLDs (including several falling under GDPR in the EU)? Their FAQ says: "Due to registry restrictions, WhoisGuard cannot be used with .asia, .ca, .cn, .uk, .co.uk, .de, .eu, .in, .id, .me, .uk, .nu, .li, .ch, .fr, .sg, .com.sg, .org.uk, .us, .es, .com.es, .nom.es, .org.es, .com.au, .net.au, .paris, .vote, .voto, .xn--3ds443g,…

DENIC (.de) has had it’s own policy including their own form of protection for a long time. Currently you can query for generic data and an abuse email address but the contact details are only revealed if you are the domain holder or have a solid reason[1]. > In all other cases, DENIC will generally not provide information. Instead, if you think that the contents of a website that can be accessed via a domain may be…

It's also worth noting .de don't allow foreigners to own their domains, in opposition of most other nation tdls. I won't considered them as an example.

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#119
post #42

I just renewed a domain with Namecheap and, based on the price they're now charging, pretty sure the cost of this “free” whois privacy protection is now just built into the cost of their products. Not impressed. Edit: spelling

I register all my domains on Namecheap, they always have a coupon you can use to save a few bucks. https://www.namecheap.com/promos/coupons/

Do they ever have any that are valid for domain renewals? Just tried DOMAYN5 and it doesn't seem to be good for that.

Re: WhoisGuard Privacy Protection is now free

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DENIC (.de) has had it’s own policy including their own form of protection for a long time. Currently you can query for generic data and an abuse email address but the contact details are only revealed if you are the domain holder or have a solid reason[1]. > In all other cases, DENIC will generally not provide information. Instead, if you think that the contents of a website that can be accessed via a domain may be…

It's also worth noting .de don't allow foreigners to own their domains, in opposition of most other nation tdls. I won't considered them as an example.

That‘s interesting, I didn‘t know that. Fully agree that they are not a good example. My last paragraph was to explain how pointless this privacy theater is anyway, considering that every website owner is required to give out much more info in the imprint.
Post reply on HN