Off topic
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it.
11–20 of 33 posts
Off topic
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it.
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
I've always wanted to like David Graeber. Superficially, he seems like a smart, rigorous, heterodox left-wing thinker. But his work is intellectually bankrupt more often than not. Brad DeLong has been doing the hard work of breaking down Graeber's facile arguments and incorrect information for years. Here's one blog post to look at if you're curious. http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2014/11/monday-smackdown-in-th...
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
> An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. Taking existing components and building something new by combining them? What on earth is wrong with that? That's great software engineering if it's possible to do for what you need.
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
I used this with a recruiter in South Florida a few years ago and it started popping up in listings...
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
You mean like in electronics?
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
Some call them "Taco Bell Programmers" as in take the same 6 ingredients and mix them up slightly differently and give the result a new name. I used this with a recruiter in South Florida a few years ago and it started popping up in listings...
I heard a radio interview by the author a few days ago. An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. I see the same behaviour everyday in the hardware industry and passed off as innovation. Edit: you can read more about the idea here. https://books.google.ie/books?id=Lsc8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> An interesting bullshit job he described is the ‘duct taper’ in software engineering. Basically those who take existing software and tape it all together as something new. Taking existing components and building something new by combining them? What on earth is wrong with that? That's great software engineering if it's possible to do for what you need.
Or a chemist who uses exiting molecules. The musician who uses existing notes.