Live data from Hacker News

GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

twitter.com

11–20 of 213 posts

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#11
post #6

The day I added an ad blocker (Adblock Plus, Ghostery and uBlock origin) was the day my CPU fans stopped spinning almost constantly, my battery life improved, web pages loaded faster and were more responsive. My experience of the web is about a thousand times better than it used to be. I will remove all these when the ad companies and websites start to behave themselves, which will be never.

>Ghostery

You surely aren't using it anymore, are you? They are now owned by an ad company.

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#12
post #3

I'm honestly starting to reach the opinion we should all be VPNing our web traffic through Europe so we can pick up more of the benefits.

But how will all the startups who need to sell your data stay in business? /s

who NEED ???? Are you kidding ??? Even without TARGETED ads, the world is still running, you know?? And if a startup business model is to make money by selling its user datas without telling them and without their consent.. well... let it die!!! And the world will be a better place...

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#13

I'm honestly starting to reach the opinion we should all be VPNing our web traffic through Europe so we can pick up more of the benefits.

It is cheaper to block the ads and tracking scripts.

Does the site degrade gracefully? What's the easiest way to train non technical users how to step through and configure each site they use?

While the technical people have ability to implement solutions. I suspect many are short on time. I think a VPN despite it's cost is a better solution for many (provide websites don't restore the js/bloated functionality)

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#14

i have often thought at what point do you start rendering web pages remotely and simply send back the (ie 'png') image to the client. A single png image of a entire web page is definitely under 5.2MB. Personally, I can't wait for a shift in business practices. Ads have ruined my confidence in privacy. Most sites share your data with over a dozen different ad tracking vendors. I've seen twice that for a specific class…

Back in 2000 people used to do this sometimes (but with jpegs). Exports from MS Publisher seemed to the worst culprit. They used image maps for navigation (https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_map.asp).

edit Clearly this is a terrible idea, just to clear up any misattribution of intent.

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#15

i have often thought at what point do you start rendering web pages remotely and simply send back the (ie 'png') image to the client. A single png image of a entire web page is definitely under 5.2MB. Personally, I can't wait for a shift in business practices. Ads have ruined my confidence in privacy. Most sites share your data with over a dozen different ad tracking vendors. I've seen twice that for a specific class…

Do you enjoy clicking links? Selecting text? Any interaction at all?

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#16
post #10

For all that cannot access both versions, keep in mind that the EU one is a vastly simpler UI, it almost looks like just a blog archive, while the US one is a more feature full typical newspaper homepage. Not saying that either one is better, just that it's not an apple to apple comparison.

> not an apple to apple comparison. Hm, what if you’re a reader looking for journalistic text articles, is the same content available on both?

I'm not a regular USA today reader, but from a brief look it seems like in the EU version only the most recent ~30 articles are "reachable" by clicks from the home page.

p.s. the EU version is on it's own subdomain, maybe you can reach it from the US too: https://eu.usatoday.com/

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#17
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But how will all the startups who need to sell your data stay in business? /s

who NEED ???? Are you kidding ??? Even without TARGETED ads, the world is still running, you know?? And if a startup business model is to make money by selling its user datas without telling them and without their consent.. well... let it die!!! And the world will be a better place...

That was the joke.

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#18

I'm honestly starting to reach the opinion we should all be VPNing our web traffic through Europe so we can pick up more of the benefits.

It is cheaper to block the ads and tracking scripts.

Lately, I've found using a VPS and setting up my own VPN is a bit cheaper (and safer? assuming you don't want anonymity).

Vultr has a $2.50 a month box with a few European locations. You only get 500gb of transfer per month on that size, but you can test the waters and size as per your needs. They even have an install script for OpenVPN if you don't want to go through that headache.

The only real downside is they limit you to 2 boxes at that size per account. Clearly just a loss leader for them (but it got me using their service).

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#19

I'm honestly starting to reach the opinion we should all be VPNing our web traffic through Europe so we can pick up more of the benefits.

It is cheaper to block the ads and tracking scripts.

> It is cheaper to block the ads and tracking scripts.

The combined effort needed to produce and maintain huge lists of rules to hide ads everywhere is probably way above the one needed to setup a VPN.

Re: GDPR Version of USA Today Is 500KB Instead of 5.2MB

#20

i have often thought at what point do you start rendering web pages remotely and simply send back the (ie 'png') image to the client. A single png image of a entire web page is definitely under 5.2MB. Personally, I can't wait for a shift in business practices. Ads have ruined my confidence in privacy. Most sites share your data with over a dozen different ad tracking vendors. I've seen twice that for a specific class…

> I have often thought at what point do you start rendering web pages remotely and simply send back the (ie 'png') image to the client.

Please never do that, unless you want your visitors to have the worst accessibility experience.

Post reply on HN