Live data from Hacker News

Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

lowtechmagazine.com

101–110 of 238 posts

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#101

I was quite excited by compressed air storage when Lightsail came into the picture almost 5-7 years ago. Sadly, they could not make the economics work and ended up pivoting into a company that sells carbon fibre tanks for high-pressure storage. As someone who follows the energy space closely, Lithium ion batteries now have so much momentum and $$$ pumped into them via R&D work, it's going to be hard for competing ene…

Aren't flywheels used in datacenters to cover the split second between when the power goes out and the generators kick on?

I toured a datacenter 5 years ago or so - and yes, they had a big flywheel for temporary power loses (until they could get the generators running)

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#102
post #87
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any kind of high-density energy storage is basically a bomb. If you charge or discharge Lithium polymer or lithuium ion batteries "wrong" they explode too. I wouldn't want to be near a flywheel that stores 360 Wh of energy when it breaks.

On the other hand, flywheels can be easily buried underground, and easily contained. The max power of a flywheel is known, so it's just a matter of putting enough concrete between humans and flywheel, a straightforward and inexpensive engineering problem. And unlike compressed air, the containment isn't under constant, wearing pressure.

You can bury the air tanks too and avoid most of the danger, but that's expensive and makes them harder to maintain. The big advantage of flywheels is that when they fail you know the energy will be discharged in a particular plane. You can orient them such that nothing vital is in that plane (like your house!). With compressed air all bets are off.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#103
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the other hand, flywheels can be easily buried underground, and easily contained. The max power of a flywheel is known, so it's just a matter of putting enough concrete between humans and flywheel, a straightforward and inexpensive engineering problem. And unlike compressed air, the containment isn't under constant, wearing pressure.

You can bury the air tanks too and avoid most of the danger, but that's expensive and makes them harder to maintain. The big advantage of flywheels is that when they fail you know the energy will be discharged in a particular plane. You can orient them such that nothing vital is in that plane (like your house!). With compressed air all bets are off.

A berm would split the difference for cost and maintenance.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#104
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For home use you also have to consider that you're basically making a bomb every time you store energy in the thing.

Any kind of high-density energy storage is basically a bomb. If you charge or discharge Lithium polymer or lithuium ion batteries "wrong" they explode too. I wouldn't want to be near a flywheel that stores 360 Wh of energy when it breaks.

Batteries don't explode in anywhere near the same fashion as an air tank, but they do include the added complication of adding a huge conflagration to the mix. So your house is burnt down instead of shattered and scattered all over the neighborhood.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My concern with batteries is we're so gung ho on producing these, we haven't stopped to consider the environmental impact from the manufacturing process or the incredible task of recycling these once they've outlived their usefulness. It reminds me a lot of when people pushed plastic for everything in order to save the trees and reduce paper consumption. Some 40 years later, we're now trying to get off plastic and de…

Back in the late 1800s, city planners met to try to come up with some plan for dealing with "the manure problem". Large cities couldn't handle the amount of manure produced by the horses in the city. They ended the meeting early, because they couldn't come up with any sort of plan. Then cars came along and they were all like "Yay! The pollution problem is solved!" I too wonder what the impact of so many lithium batte…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9gnvZLkewg

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#106
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any kind of high-density energy storage is basically a bomb. If you charge or discharge Lithium polymer or lithuium ion batteries "wrong" they explode too. I wouldn't want to be near a flywheel that stores 360 Wh of energy when it breaks.

360Wh of flywheel is tiny. You could easily bury it and never have to worry about the danger of a failure. Grid scale flywheels are the ones that are scary.

... and they too can be buried. Seems a bit more attractive than compressed air.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#107

I was quite excited by compressed air storage when Lightsail came into the picture almost 5-7 years ago. Sadly, they could not make the economics work and ended up pivoting into a company that sells carbon fibre tanks for high-pressure storage. As someone who follows the energy space closely, Lithium ion batteries now have so much momentum and $$$ pumped into them via R&D work, it's going to be hard for competing ene…

In a sense then you could say it's the Javascript of energy storage.

Not the best on technical merits alone, but good enough along with a massive force of investment and wide adoption.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#108
post #51

I'm surprised no one is talking about how scary it is that you are basically making a high powered bomb at your house any time you have one of these. Anyone that has watched Mystbusters understands the incredible destructive power stored in compressed air. I'll stick with batteries, thanks.

You probably keep multiple gallons of gasoline nearby, tho.

Air is far more explosive than gasoline. Gasoline is practically docile compared to the equivalent energy stored as compressed air. When a vessel of compressed air ruptures, it almost instantaneously decimates everything around it with a powerful shockwave. Think of a popping balloon, but scaled up 10000x. You think a hot water heater is bad? Just imagine the entire house being demolished in a second.

Gasoline, on the other hands, just burns in a hot concentrated fire. It takes entire minutes to kill that which is nearby.

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Similar to those gravity power modules: a company called Ares ( https://www.aresnorthamerica.com/ ) is trying to use much smaller concrete 'cars' on rails to store energy. Not sure of the status of it but it looked promising to me. The direct use of compressed air is interesting. Taking it to the extreme, you could have compressed air as your primary utility piped through your home, and have appliances that run off c…

I looked at the Ares 'team page' and I personally know the CEO of that company, but I didn't know he was working with that company. super random. Your refrigeration example is interesting - now I'm curious if there's any refrigerators on the market that can power the compressor via compressed air intake (so it would still use closed-loop refrigerant, but the compressor would use air instead of electricity)

[deleted]

Re: Ditch the Batteries: Off-Grid Compressed Air Energy Storage

#110

An early design for the automobile ran on compressed (liquid!) air. http://www.didik.com/ev_hist.htm It might work for some applications, but in 120 years we haven't been able to make it work for cars, at least.

IIRC there are compressed air cars used in India. They aren't very good, but you get free air conditioning when they're moving and they're cheap, so they fit the market well.
Post reply on HN