Live data from Hacker News

A simple mechanism could have been decisive for the development of life

phys.org

11–20 of 67 posts

Re: A simple mechanism could have been decisive for the development of life

#15
post #12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not if there's evidence of one, no. Why, do you have some?

The existence of the universe itself

Apologists have used the same argument for the last several hundred years and have done nothing to push the discussion forward.

Re: A simple mechanism could have been decisive for the development of life

#17
This is one in a number of papers exploring how biological phase separation/condensation may have provided favourable microenvironments for early life development.

For a nice primer on what biological phase separation is, see this (non-paywalled) general audience article from earlier this year in Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-03070-2).

Some other work on phase separation as a means for primordial evolution and biochemistry includes a paper from Christine Keating in 2012 (WAY WAY ahead of the curve) [1], elegant work by Frank Jülicher [2], and more recently a nice paper from Keating and Phil Bevilacqua [3].

These papers (IMO) tie rather nicely into some theoretical predictions on self-organization from Jeremy England [4].

[1] Keating, C.D. (2012). Aqueous phase separation as a possible route to compartmentalization of biological molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 2114–2124.

[2] Zwicker, D., Seyboldt, R., Weber, C.A., Hyman, A.A., and Jülicher, F. (2016). Growth and division of active droplets provides a model for protocells. Nat. Phys. 13, 408.

[3] Poudyal, R.R., Pir Cakmak, F., Keating, C.D., and Bevilacqua, P.C. (2018). Physical Principles and Extant Biology Reveal Roles for RNA-Containing Membraneless Compartments in Origins of Life Chemistry. Biochemistry 57, 2509–2519.

[4] England, J.L. (2013). Statistical physics of self-replication. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 121923.

Re: A simple mechanism could have been decisive for the development of life

#18
post #12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not if there's evidence of one, no. Why, do you have some?

The existence of the universe itself

The only thing that proves is that the universe exists. Claiming that someone created it is only moving the question, because who then made the creator?

Re: A simple mechanism could have been decisive for the development of life

#20

Is it so hard to believe that there's a creator maybe?

Who/what created the creator then?

And please don't say "the creator has always been there", because the same could be said about a universe to make a creator redundant...

Post reply on HN