Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
91–100 of 352 posts
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#92Don’t understand this. Blocking a person does not prevent the followers of said person to see the conversation , thus it’s not a public forum?
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#93Surely that must mean that Twitter banning people is also a violation of the first amendment, since that prevents them from accessing the same "public square" this ruling is protecting their access to.
1st isn't the right to hearing, it's the right to speech (but not specifically speaking on Twitter)
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've noticed there are a lot of rude replies under most of Trumps tweets. I'd think it would be normal to block that kind of thing but I guess it's an odd situation - Twitter wasn't really designed for the president of the US. For example - just the most recent https://twitter.com/ronrobiins/status/999283009957318656 - presidential ain't what it used to be.
To be fair, no president was this rude. at least, not in public.
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#95This seems wrong on the face of it. The judge asks the rhetorical question of whether the logic changes based on whether he's president or not, and he answers his question with a "No". So this is saying that no public official can block others on Twitter. That seems like it's in the "suicide pact" column of rights defense, but then I'm not one that cares about Twitter personally. Just seems that plenty of other forum…
[0] https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/criminal/what-s-a-public-...
[1] http://amp.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/07/28/federal_c...
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've noticed there are a lot of rude replies under most of Trumps tweets. I'd think it would be normal to block that kind of thing but I guess it's an odd situation - Twitter wasn't really designed for the president of the US. For example - just the most recent https://twitter.com/ronrobiins/status/999283009957318656 - presidential ain't what it used to be.
To be fair, no president was this rude. at least, not in public.
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#97Will this apply to all government officials on twitter? Can twitter still ban a user if they deem the content to be harassment/etc?
The limitations on public officials engaging in viewpoint censorship in a public forum, including a privately owned one, are not new, nor is this the first case where they have been applied to social media accounts. The rules do apply to all government agencies and officials, already, and not just “on Twitter”.
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#98"The judge declined to issue an order forcing Trump to unblock the users, saying her ruling should be sufficient to force a change in behavior." Because Trump is the master of sub-text and will pick up that he should unblock them.
What a stupid situation.
Hopefully Twitter will throw him a bone and offer to mute everyone that was blocked on the back-end.
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#99Will this apply to all government officials on twitter? Can twitter still ban a user if they deem the content to be harassment/etc?
Re: Judge Rules Trump Can’t Block People on Twitter
#100I feel pretty conflicted on this. The way Trump is using his Twitter, it almost becomes public property. I mean he's making huge announcements, almost solely on Twitter. So, at that point, it's almost like denying public access to the State of the Union. But, on the other hand, it's his damn Twitter and he should be able to do whatever he wants with it. I guess it begs the question, when you're a "public servant", an…