Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
1–10 of 151 posts
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#2Exhaustive analysis of ICO white papers shows about 1/4 contain major red flags. The bar the WSJ set is pretty low (as in easy to pass without raising flags). Any white paper that didn't plagiarize long passages, re-use others' headshots or fail to name principals, or fail mention risk basically passes.
It's also worth noting that the multi-billion dollar figure cited for total funds raised through ICOs is about as reliable as the ICOs themselves, since it's based on self-reported figures from ICOs that frequently appear out of thin air with multi-million claims of funds raised so far.
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#3Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#4Article is non-paywalled for once. Exhaustive analysis of ICO white papers shows about 1/4 contain major red flags. The bar the WSJ set is pretty low (as in easy to pass without raising flags). Any white paper that didn't plagiarize long passages, re-use others' headshots or fail to name principals, or fail mention risk basically passes. It's also worth noting that the multi-billion dollar figure cited for total fund…
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#5It's the gold rush that killed crypto-currencies. They are dead, but their gold rush enthusiasts are going to hang on for a decade hoping to recoup their pride.
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#6- Wallets have bugs that lose hundreds of millions of dollars
- Energy consumption forecasted to hit 0.5% of the world’s electricity consumption by end of 2018
- Promoters yelling “decentralize everything” while exchanges, development teams and mining are all highly centralized
- No legal use case found to date
Blockchain is a parasite on society.
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#7Article is non-paywalled for once. Exhaustive analysis of ICO white papers shows about 1/4 contain major red flags. The bar the WSJ set is pretty low (as in easy to pass without raising flags). Any white paper that didn't plagiarize long passages, re-use others' headshots or fail to name principals, or fail mention risk basically passes. It's also worth noting that the multi-billion dollar figure cited for total fund…
Want to see something truly scary? Pick a coin, any coin, that has had a major vulnerability discovered by researchers in a peer-reviewed publication. Then go onto that coin’s subreddit and watch in amazement as a bunch of security illiterate redditors bend over backwards to invalidate the paper’s claims with conspiratorial nonsense and cries of spreading FUD.
Blind loyalty is bad enough in meatspace. In the cryptocurrency realm, it’s simply dangerous.
The crazy thing is that any one of these coins could have a double-spending vulnerability, which by its very nature would likely be undiscoverable. There could very well be some clever hacker somewhere exploiting double spends and slowly bleeding money out of exchanges.
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#8- The space is littered with fraud. - Wallets have bugs that lose hundreds of millions of dollars - Energy consumption forecasted to hit 0.5% of the world’s electricity consumption by end of 2018 - Promoters yelling “decentralize everything” while exchanges, development teams and mining are all highly centralized - No legal use case found to date Blockchain is a parasite on society.
Re: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud
#9No, not just illegal stuff like intershipsp for no pay but more major stuff like outright fabrication of founder bios, etc.