I've just abandoned using a smartphone in favor of a $20 dumb Alcatel phone that can only do three things: calls, alarms, and an FM radio. It doesn't even vibrate. I offloaded every other functional use into my tablet, in this case an iPad Pro. The phone battery lasts for days on standby; I can drain my tablet battery without concern. I can leave the tablet at home if I want to stay light or if I want to stay focused…
What do you do for navigation? (Thats literally the only feature keeping me with a smart phone right now).
Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
11–20 of 141 posts
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#12I've just abandoned using a smartphone in favor of a $20 dumb Alcatel phone that can only do three things: calls, alarms, and an FM radio. It doesn't even vibrate. I offloaded every other functional use into my tablet, in this case an iPad Pro. The phone battery lasts for days on standby; I can drain my tablet battery without concern. I can leave the tablet at home if I want to stay light or if I want to stay focused…
What do you do for navigation? (Thats literally the only feature keeping me with a smart phone right now).
Seems like keeping an iPad with cellular data around would be a good solution, but it starts to risk being "too good."
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#13I've just abandoned using a smartphone in favor of a $20 dumb Alcatel phone that can only do three things: calls, alarms, and an FM radio. It doesn't even vibrate. I offloaded every other functional use into my tablet, in this case an iPad Pro. The phone battery lasts for days on standby; I can drain my tablet battery without concern. I can leave the tablet at home if I want to stay light or if I want to stay focused…
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#14Different strokes for different folks, but I wouldn't miss it at all.
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#15The phone is not smart or dumb. The user is.
Considering that the darker edges of "app engagement" are trying to replicate gambling addiction, I hesitate to call users dumb when they don't act in their best self interest.
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#16I've just abandoned using a smartphone in favor of a $20 dumb Alcatel phone that can only do three things: calls, alarms, and an FM radio. It doesn't even vibrate. I offloaded every other functional use into my tablet, in this case an iPad Pro. The phone battery lasts for days on standby; I can drain my tablet battery without concern. I can leave the tablet at home if I want to stay light or if I want to stay focused…
What do you do for navigation? (Thats literally the only feature keeping me with a smart phone right now).
My car has a builtin GPS. Navigation has been an issue only once when joining a friend to a restaurant on foot, believe it or not I asked my way around and found the place.
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#17Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#18Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you do for navigation? (Thats literally the only feature keeping me with a smart phone right now).
Not OP, but can answer. What everyone used to do.
Abandoning modern technology doesn't seem like the better alternative in this case.
Re: Is a Dumber Phone a Better Phone?
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you do for navigation? (Thats literally the only feature keeping me with a smart phone right now).
I've done this in the past, and I would pull up the route in Maps on the tablet and then take it with me. But that doesn't handle getting lost, or last minute detours, etc. Seems like keeping an iPad with cellular data around would be a good solution, but it starts to risk being "too good."