The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
1–10 of 435 posts
Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#2Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#3Apache has official mirrors that host repo files for various package managers so you can install using apt-get or whatever it is that replaced yum (dnf? dnf):
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/bigtop/bigtop-1.2.1/re...
So precompiled binaries from official sources are certainly available.
Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#4Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#5Is there anything more "get-off-my-lawn" than "These tools don't use the thing I like!"
Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#6"No one cares about verifiable security anymore."
The author defines a category of people and then attacks it for A) not verifying the integrity of its systems, and B) not doing things with make.
A is valid and something that needs attention. B is missing the point.
Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#7Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#8> And since nobody is still able to compile things from scratch, everybody just downloads precompiled binaries from random websites. Often without any authentication or signature. Apache has official mirrors that host repo files for various package managers so you can install using apt-get or whatever it is that replaced yum (dnf? dnf): https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/bigtop/bigtop-1.2.1/re... So precompiled bi…
"Unless you compile it yourself, you can't trust it."
Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#9Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
#10> None of these "fancy" tools still builds by a traditional make command. Is there anything more "get-off-my-lawn" than "These tools don't use the thing I like!"