Is it true that most of Silicon Valley runs on CentOS?
It's mixed CentOS, Debian and Ubuntu. Ubuntu is limited to younger folks and younger companies.
CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
51–57 of 57 posts
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#52Is it true that most of Silicon Valley runs on CentOS?
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#53Technical problem for which I haven't found a hint of an answer online: I'm installing CentOS 7.0 x64 on a Thinkpad, my first Linux install. The install seems to go fine but on boot, right after the BIOS splash screen, in text mode, I see the following, then it stops (I'm going to use italics to be nice to people with small screens): Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found Failed to load image \EFI\BOOT\grub…
First, let me say that if you're doing a clean/new installation, I'd recommend installing CentOS 7.5 directly (as opposed to, say, installing 7.0 and immediately upgrading to 7.5). 7.0 is almost four years old at this point and your ThinkPad's hardware may be slightly better supported by 7.5. Anyways, you might consider posting the details (including verbatim error messages, hardware (partitioning) details, etc.) in…
It seemed that the EFI/boot/bootx64.efi that would get loaded instead (EFI default loader search) couldn't find grub in the EFI/centos folder. It booted fine after I copied the relavent grub files over to EFI/boot, but it seemed like a really kludgy solution. Fine for a single research box, but not for production.
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's mixed CentOS, Debian and Ubuntu. Ubuntu is limited to younger folks and younger companies.
Not SV, but according to my anecdata, RHEL/CentOS is more oftenly used in enterprise deployments, while Debian (and Ubuntu) traditionally dominates Web deployments. A Debian-style Apache httpd setup with structured config files and a2ensite, a2enmod, etc. is also what mainstream shared hosting workflows are based on.
And half of them had screwed up their entire setup by installing the Remi repos. Sigh.
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's mixed CentOS, Debian and Ubuntu. Ubuntu is limited to younger folks and younger companies.
Not SV, but according to my anecdata, RHEL/CentOS is more oftenly used in enterprise deployments, while Debian (and Ubuntu) traditionally dominates Web deployments. A Debian-style Apache httpd setup with structured config files and a2ensite, a2enmod, etc. is also what mainstream shared hosting workflows are based on.
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#56Make sure you get VirtualBox 5.2.12 if you want to run it as guest, or the additions won’t work. Found that out last week!
Curious about the downvotes, is this statement factually wrong? It does not work with 5.2.10, because I tried it.
Re: CentOS Linux 7.5 (1804) Released
#57Where are good places to find CentOS technical documentation and community? I can't find a manual online, and the other resources seem insufficient. I think I must be missing something: These forums seem to have not great content or traffic (at least when I looked): https://www.centos.org/forums/ The FAQ is only a few questions, and the How-tos and Tips & Tricks are very uneven in their coverage and often outdated ("…
There is a fair amount of content on the CentOS wiki but, as you've noticed, some of it is extremely outdated or was written for older CentOS versions. One page on there that I came across recently was almost 10 years old! Depending on what the topic is, the age of an article may not be all that relevant -- the important thing is to make sure that it's aimed at the version of CentOS that you're running. Some of those…