61–70 of 201 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not a lie, it's describing the way they wrote their software. Yes, they could have written it to use only GPS, but it's not written that way.
It is written that way. If you dismiss that prompt it goes away and works just fine.
the maps app will show that warning every damn time gps is enabled. every. single. time.
> "The information fed back to Google includes barometric pressure readings so it can work out, for example, which level of a shopping mall you are on." I scoffed, but this is actually a thing: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431287/ (It's also useful for weather observations, see the old PressureNET.io site for an opt-in version.) Anyway, my monthly mobile data usage for Google services is 110 MB and t…
Are barometric sensors commonplace in smartphones?
The second is, that if there is some private leveraged advantage Google gets, over other people, which dis-equilibriates in the commons, This is not good, and I should be told quite clearly thats the case, and how it works.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is written that way. If you dismiss that prompt it goes away and works just fine.
it doesnt work just fine because google uses a dark UI pattern. the maps app will show that warning every damn time gps is enabled. every. single. time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not certain why the downvotes; apart from community ROMs and Amazon's Android devices, Samsung has been positioning itself for some time to not be completely reliant on Google for it's phone business - they have an App Store of their own and their own duplicate functionality of many of Google's core services for Android. I wouldn't be surprised if they de-coupled from Google entirely at some point (yes, they'd need t…
I read the Samsung privacy policy, it's honestly not much better. Is there a project to replace all of play services with FOSS/encrypted ones?
You can make do (as I do) with LineageOS, F-Droid, and APKMirror. The last is run by the AndroidPolice folks and is therefore trustworthy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A known avenue of data acquisition is to wait until a wifi connections to transmit large amounts of data.
It is, however, the article states: > The experts, from computer and software corporation Oracle, claim Google is draining roughly one gigabyte of mobile data monthly from Android phone users’ accounts as it snoops in the background, collecting information to help advertisers. Then goes on to give a cost breakdown of how much this hypothetical data download is costing Australian's via their mobile data connections.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not certain why the downvotes; apart from community ROMs and Amazon's Android devices, Samsung has been positioning itself for some time to not be completely reliant on Google for it's phone business - they have an App Store of their own and their own duplicate functionality of many of Google's core services for Android. I wouldn't be surprised if they de-coupled from Google entirely at some point (yes, they'd need t…
I read the Samsung privacy policy, it's honestly not much better. Is there a project to replace all of play services with FOSS/encrypted ones?
Here's a the same story via the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/14/australia... A quote contained within both stories: > The software company Oracle revealed Google could be harvesting a gigabyte of data from Android devices each month Given that my data plan is 1.5 GB/month, I would notice if a gigabyte magically disappeared every month (it doesn't). Hopefully the ACCC has enough skepticism…
I'd assume that not all that information would require real-time feeding of data back to Google. So quite a lot I'd assume would be buffered and sent back while you're on a wifi connection.
> The experts, from computer and software corporation Oracle, claim Google is draining roughly one gigabyte of mobile data monthly from Android phone users’ accounts as it snoops in the background, collecting information to help advertisers.
Then goes on to give a cost breakdown of how much this hypothetical data download is costing Australian's via their mobile data connections.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is the difference? Both the hardware and the software are covered by hundreds of patents, copyright protections, license agreements, end user agreements, etc. The question here is what basic privacies can someone expect when they purchase a phone, and how transparent do companies need to be about what information they are collecting.
The difference is the essence of ownership. Google/Apple can't physically take away my phone, but they could declare a violation of the terms of service and terminate the software license agreement.