Live data from Hacker News

Tim Draper defends Theranos and its disgraced founder and CEO, Elizabeth Holmes

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 88 posts

Re: Tim Draper defends Theranos and its disgraced founder and CEO, Elizabeth Holmes

#2
> “Why is [Theranos] worthless? It’s worthless because this writer was like a badger going after her, like a hyena going after her, and then it became a bigger and bigger thing,” he said. “She got bullied into submission,” Draper explained, adding that if it weren’t for Carreyrou and other opponents, Theranos “could have been one of these big, huge winners.”

And we would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for that meddling journalist!!! shakes fist in the air

Re: Tim Draper defends Theranos and its disgraced founder and CEO, Elizabeth Holmes

#4
> “Amid his mind-boggling defense, the investor did admit that Theranos was now in the “loser column” of his investments list, a list that also includes Tesla and Bitcoin.“

Interestingly, at Collision Conf this year, while on stage being interviewed, he was pumping up Bitcoin like it was going to the moon. Strange investor I guess.

Re: Tim Draper defends Theranos and its disgraced founder and CEO, Elizabeth Holmes

#9

From what I understand about biology (which is little), there was no real way this was ever going to work. Am I missing something?

What they promised is theoretically possible, but they ran afoul of the huge practical problems that made people with actual biology and engineering backgrounds (like myself) very, very skeptical.

Re: Tim Draper defends Theranos and its disgraced founder and CEO, Elizabeth Holmes

#10

From what I understand about biology (which is little), there was no real way this was ever going to work. Am I missing something?

What they promised is theoretically possible, but they ran afoul of the huge practical problems that made people with actual biology and engineering backgrounds (like myself) very, very skeptical.

(Oh, and massive financial shenanigans.)
Post reply on HN