Live data from Hacker News

My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

reddit.com

21–30 of 76 posts

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#21
post #13

His comments on the radiator grill aren't fair. The temperature of steam won't exceed 100 degrees C which some plastics are fine with. And the downward slope is to stop spilt water dripping inside. The fan (if it's working after that error!) will push the air through enough.

Given the quality of the rest of the system, I have a hard time believing they put that much thought into it.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you should invent some performance metric profitability and growth

That's not something that is measurable for office managers. I don't think office managers need metrics - just a suggestion box. Most thinks are really obvious, especially if you let people tell you about them. I guarantee if the had a suggestion box nobody would suggest an IoT water cooler.

I agree. Metrics have side effects as well. Optimizing for particular metrics can make an organisation incur tunnel vision, and leads to some really perverse and inefficient practices that don't really achieve the spirit of the metric.

Think hard about what to measure and not measuring anything at all is totally valid. Just talk to the humans in your org to see if they're happy and if they need any particular changes.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#24

As I get older, I really wonder why people do this to other people. In this case, I'm talking about the manufacturer of this product. They know other human beings are going to spend a lot of money to use their products? It's important to make money, but at what consequence?

To be fair, better implementations of this (mix your own flavored sparkling water machines) are pretty nice to have around. I'm not sure they're worth $1000/year but they do cut down on waste from plastic soda bottles and cans.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#26
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's like evolution. Why does some weird, seemingly useless creature exist? Because it fills some crack in the ecological economy. Someone was willing to buy this piece of shit and that is explanation enough for its existence.

I read about apples exported from China, covered in a toxic paint so they look red and beautiful, even though it is harmful, all to make a buck. I just wonder why humans have not evolved to, at a minimum, actually show some caring attitude toward others of their same species. I think we're all doomed.

Red apples usually are coated in ground up beetle to give the bright redness colour. It’s considered non toxic. Donno if that’s the same as what you’re referring to. I think it’s called Shellac.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#27

Everyone likes to blame loose VC money for silly stuff like this, but I have a slightly more nuanced theory about ridiculous office perks: Office managers/office teams have very few concrete metrics. Beyond a binary "is the office functional" (e.g. are there enough desks, does the electricity work) there is pretty much no way to measure job performance. That's not to say their work doesn't have any impact. Anyone who…

That $800 plant isn't even a cactus as advertised (much less a desert cactus).

Cactus are native to the Americas. The plant in the photo is a Euphorbia (closely related to the poinsetta sold around Christmas) and is from Africa. It looks like a cactus but isn't related at all.

One way to tell the difference between cactus and these "imposters" is that real cactus have spines protruding from a detachable pad that can be pulled cleanly off (the spines are an evolved leaf and detach in a similar way). The spines of the Euphorbia on the other hand are part of the main body of the plant and can't be cleanly detached.

Probably only a few plant nerds really care, but for $800 they shouldn't call it something it manifestly isn't IMOP.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#28
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's like evolution. Why does some weird, seemingly useless creature exist? Because it fills some crack in the ecological economy. Someone was willing to buy this piece of shit and that is explanation enough for its existence.

I read about apples exported from China, covered in a toxic paint so they look red and beautiful, even though it is harmful, all to make a buck. I just wonder why humans have not evolved to, at a minimum, actually show some caring attitude toward others of their same species. I think we're all doomed.

> actually show some caring attitude toward others of their same species.

because the person doing the bad stuff does not see the suffering of the end user, even if he sees it, he does not care.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#29
Things like this make me wonder about our Keurig, which could have been replaced years ago with a Bunn dual burner for less money and probably better coffee. Plus if everybody went to the breakroom at 9, 12 and 3 for coffee, collaboration would improve.

Re: My company signed up for a $1000/year subscription-based water cooler

#30

As I get older, I really wonder why people do this to other people. In this case, I'm talking about the manufacturer of this product. They know other human beings are going to spend a lot of money to use their products? It's important to make money, but at what consequence?

I think you're overcomplicating it: people often prefer their gain to others' gain.

And especially in the business mindset, the impact of the work you do is pretty much always downplayed. Same reason autoplay videos exist. It's very hard for a business structure to say no to an increase in profit due to a negative that's hard to quantify and that won't also result in an increase in profit.

Post reply on HN