Live data from Hacker News

$1M to build decentralized social networks

requestforsocialnetworks.com

41–50 of 134 posts

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#41

Decentralised social networks are a bad idea. Communication tools need to be inclusive and open to everyone, especially laypeople. Decentralised tools and blockchain turn off non-techies, and are overkill for the social networking problem.

Is this sarcasm? I honestly can't tell.

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#43

One of the questions is: "describe your social network in 50 characters or less." "Facebook but decentralised" is already 26 characters so that seems like a bit of a tight limit. I suppose it'll help find people who have any marketing nouse, which is the actual challenge for a project like this, not technology.

Last question:

"Please implement the social network in 5 weeks or less, GitHub link to code too please"

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#44
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you feel that strongly, stop using them. I stopped using Facebook a year ago, and now my most social sites are YouTube and reddit. Neither are as toxic for me as Facebook was. You won’t save others, but it’s easy to save yourself.

> now my most social sites are YouTube and reddit So out of the fire, and into the frying pan.

I thought this was weird too, because both YouTube and reddit are quite addictive, just like Facebook. YouTube's recommendations are an endless pit of wasted time unless one takes care to view only a small, curated set of channels with daily time limits. As for reddit, it's quite noisy (like Twitter) and attracts a lot of what I consider low value comments and posts (the kinds that are discouraged on HN and get ruthlessly downvoted to oblivion here).

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#45

Nobody needs a social network anymore, whether it is decentralized (Mastodon, Diaspora) or centralized (Facebook, Twitter). I think the social media bubble burst a long time ago and we just didn't realize it. I also have a Mastodon account, but used it only for a short time. I speak now only for myself personally, social networks bore me quite and I have no more interest to sign up somewhere.

Facebook alone has over 2 billion users, and keeps growing. I can't see how it is a bubble that has burst.

I've met many people in developing countries that don't have running water, or indoor sanitation, but still access Facebook through a cheap smartphone. It's important to a great many people.

Personally I find Facebook extremely useful; I just hate the implementation, which seems to be a buggy mix of dark patterns which attempt to manipulate my state of mind and do bad things with my personal data.

A realistic open competitor would be extremely welcome, but first you have to somehow get past the network effect.

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#46

Nobody needs a social network anymore, whether it is decentralized (Mastodon, Diaspora) or centralized (Facebook, Twitter). I think the social media bubble burst a long time ago and we just didn't realize it. I also have a Mastodon account, but used it only for a short time. I speak now only for myself personally, social networks bore me quite and I have no more interest to sign up somewhere.

The billion plus active users on Facebook would like to disagree with you. It's undeniable that social networks are needed and are as popular as ever. It's not always the same ones (more people moved to Instagram) but the overall number is definitely higher than ever.

There is simply no replacement solution for staying in touch with people outside of phone number based solutions à la WhatsApp (which you could argue is also a social network).

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#47

Nobody needs a social network anymore, whether it is decentralized (Mastodon, Diaspora) or centralized (Facebook, Twitter). I think the social media bubble burst a long time ago and we just didn't realize it. I also have a Mastodon account, but used it only for a short time. I speak now only for myself personally, social networks bore me quite and I have no more interest to sign up somewhere.

Nobody needs a social network anymore

This sort of comment is why people in tech are very often seen as being incredibly bad at solving non-trivial social problems by people outside of our industry. Somewhere between a third and a half of all the people on Earth see enough value in social networks to use one regularly. There are plenty of problems with the way networks work, and what they do to our mental health, but the notion that no one should use them any more is plain stupid.

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#48

This blockstack architecture is pretty interesting, but I wish it didn't have a Token attached: https://blockstack.org/whitepaper.pdf Anyone know of a similar decentralized DNS platform and allows users to 'own' their personal data without an attached ICO?

Not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for but I just stumbled upon the Dat project myself. https://datproject.org/

Thanks! A system after my own heart, it even uses a Merkle tree instead of a blockchain Does this have a system that allows users to keep ownership of their personal data?

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#49
post #29
post #17

They want it built on their tech here: https://blockstack.org/ . "New Internet" aye? Is this an based on an episode of Silicon Valley ?

Muneeb Ali, Blockstack co-founder here. I'm a technical consultant to the Silicon Valley show (season 5) along with my co-founder Ryan. So yes there is a link to the show but the project is not based on the show :-) Blockstack was in the R&D phase until early 2017 (building the core tech & infrastructure), we launched our browser last summer and now have decentralized apps built on the platform that are live. These a…

Quick question - what are the terms of the $100k funding? (grant, SAFE, equity, loan, etc ?)

Re: $1M to build decentralized social networks

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did stop using them, years ago. YouTube I tolerate because I disable comments. Reddit is a cesspool.

There are several valid places to draw the line between what is and isn't a social network, but aren't there enough similarities between Reddit and HN to not draw it between the two? Subreddits is the main difference I think, but that sort of thing can't be a requirement because Twitter doesn't have something similar.

Sure, but HN is civilized, Reddit is not.
Post reply on HN