Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fascinating, thanks for posting this. Buffett thinks it's irrational to pay $1750 for one ounce of gold when he could own 22 shares of Exxon Mobil for the same price. Let's assume he's correct. Since the value of Exxon Mobil should compound over the decades much faster than gold, it should be worth more today, right? But markets are already discounting those future cash flows, isn't that already built in to the curre…
Buffett recently said the annual real return on gold since Jesus's time would be about 0.2%/annum. I'm not sure what Exxon has done/is likely to do but probably a lot more than that. He tries to buy things likely to make 15%/annum hence no gold. As an aside Buffett and others are very unfair to tulips. A tulip can produce many offspring tulips which can be sold for cash and currently account for about 10% of Hollands…
How many businesses from Jesus's time are still here today?
The gold that was around 2000 years ago is still here.