Live data from Hacker News

NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

reuters.com

321–330 of 360 posts

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#321
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We've banned this account for using HN primarily for ideological battle. That's a serious abuse because it destroys the intellectual curiosity this place exists for. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

although I genuinely couldn't tell if the responder was being serious, I think it's a shame the account was banned. I respect the decision, but I think it's a mistake to equate incoherence with ideology. I feel duty-bound to engage patiently with people with whom I disagree, but I understand that this might be inconsistent with the more general goal of running a forum.

It gets rather simple pretty quickly if you look at the site as a whole: accounts that repeatedly post like that one did have a destructive effect on the community, just like fire has on a town. We know it's mostly unintentional, but the flames don't burn less for that reason. We want the town to survive, so we can't let people do this here.

The analogy is good in another way too: we don't care what color the flames are, or what was used to start them. People sometimes complain that we moderate red flames more than blue and vice versa, but the issue is the same in both cases.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Russians and Chinese manipulate the American public every day all day. Not to mention the Americans and Western Europeans with money and influence whose interests align with theirs. How do you think we ended up with president chump?

How do you think we ended up with president chump? No. The alternative is a crook.

It's not really an alternative if Trump is also a crook, which he is.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe they behave the way they do because this is their strategy by design. I feel that during the Cold War strategists realized that being a democracy is a vulnerability. Were the soviets actually willing to go there and exploit it by manipulating the American public? Who knows. But that’s not how military strategy is created.

The Russians and Chinese manipulate the American public every day all day. Not to mention the Americans and Western Europeans with money and influence whose interests align with theirs. How do you think we ended up with president chump?

> How do you think we ended up with president chump?

You watched too much crap TV and accepted it as reasonable fare. That assent, a small psychological step for you, a big collective "we are, indeed, collectively stupid people" for American-mankind, is what got you here.

Don't blame the poor Chinese.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#324

Clapper committed perjury and walked away a free man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=796gZxR9vVk

He probably celebrated heavy on March 18. That's when statue of limitation expired.

https://www.rt.com/usa/421041-clapper-perjury-congress-five-...

What a dirtbag.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#325
post #195

Automatically collecting everyone's cell phone data, has software automatically installed in Smart TV's everywhere, monitors your online footprint (emails, social media[of course]). All those warning from Snowden all those secret software reveals from wikileaks an untold amount of funding from congress with virtually no oversight. And yet tons of bad things keep happening to regular citizens in the US. What exactly d…

I don’t like the data collection either, but it’s impossible to know the untold disasters that it may or may not have prevented. “Assume that a legislator with courage, influence, intellect, vision, and perseverance manages to enact a law that goes into universal effect and employment on September 10, 2001; it imposes the continuously locked bulletproof doors in every cockpit (at high costs to the struggling airlines…

It is not impossible to know, at least partially. The Intercept has been publishing batches of their internal newsletters which includes examples of success stories.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#326

Is there a chance, nay, is there not certainty, that some individual or group of persons in the NSA could or does, by selectively monitoring, personally gain tremendous wealth or influence? E.g., if I were an NSA employee and used my access to follow the phone calls of, say, the officers of Goldman-Sachs? What information, of financial value, could I possibly gain? What possibilities for gain await a a rogue organize…

If you tried that, you would get a screen informing you that searching US Persons is forbidden. As it sounds intentional in your scenario, you would then be fired and be subject to further action.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#327
post #321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

although I genuinely couldn't tell if the responder was being serious, I think it's a shame the account was banned. I respect the decision, but I think it's a mistake to equate incoherence with ideology. I feel duty-bound to engage patiently with people with whom I disagree, but I understand that this might be inconsistent with the more general goal of running a forum.

It gets rather simple pretty quickly if you look at the site as a whole: accounts that repeatedly post like that one did have a destructive effect on the community, just like fire has on a town. We know it's mostly unintentional, but the flames don't burn less for that reason. We want the town to survive, so we can't let people do this here. The analogy is good in another way too: we don't care what color the flames…

Thanks for the clarification, I respect your decision. Also thanks for what I imagine to be the rather thankless effort of moderating HN.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of your sources support your claims. I've been pointing to the exact same sources. I do not work for the US government any more than you work for the Kremlin. Obama called for a "thoughtful fact based debate" over government data collection policies in the wake of the Snowden leaks. By spreading nonsense, you are preventing that debate from occurring.

I guess that means no citations.

How about TFA for a citation? If you had read it, you would have known that the article you linked is no longer relevant.

How about the article you linked for a citation? If you had read the article you posted, you would have known that it doesn't support your full-take of content claim.

Exactly the same as with GGP, my citations are the articles that you and he posted.

Re: NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp rise: official report

#330
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is attributing too much agency to "government". Voters wanted slavery, and so public officials supported it. Voters wanted wars and a surveillance state after 9/11. Etc. (Same goes for the good things that the public sector does, of course) Yes there is inertia and self-perpetuation, like in any organisations, but not overwhelmingly much.

> Voters wanted wars and a surveillance state after 9/11. It could be argued that voters were manipulated towards that point of view.

> It could be argued

Not in polite company. In polite company the "voters want wars and surveillance" by prep school secret society "blue bloods" cum "masters of the universe".

Post reply on HN