Live data from Hacker News

GDPR compliance as a service

gdpr-shield.io

121–130 of 158 posts

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#121
post #12

Anyone can expand on what "vindictive reporting from no-win-no-fee legal firms" would exactly consist of?

If an EU citizen believes that their personally identifiable information was obtained without their consent, the EU GDPR allows firms to do an audit on the company. The citizen who filed the complaint would enlist help from a no-win-no-fee legal firm, meaning, if they don't win (with infractions being $10 million minimum), the citizen, who is now a client of the firm, would not be out any money. If they do win, most…

> with infractions being $10 million minimum)

FFS, this is a maximum, not minimum.

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#122
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How a company "specifically targets its services at individuals in the EU" is not clearly defined within GDPR. Does that mean that (e.g.) German bloggers are not bound to the GDPR when they just add "made for the Swiss" to their header?

What personal data are German bloggers gathering?

IP addresses, e-mail addresses from those who comment...

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#123
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, your understanding is completely correct. Only EU member states can levy fines under the GDPR, and it's likely few will have any interest in trying to fine small businesses. Lawsuits are possible, but only for damages, and good luck showing any damages from a minor technical violation by a small SaaS tool. And without any prospect of large damages from a deep-pocketed defendant, good luck finding a law firm will…

I don't have a lot of actual information on this, but the buzz in my privacy professional listservs is that EU courts have been VERY expansive about what constitutes "damage" in related legal spheres, and that those of us coming from a US legal background should not rely on our instincts about what kinds of damage could actually create a cause of action worth suing over.

No. EU courts tend to define damage conservatively, and people suing for damage normally have to demonstrate actual financial losses.

But it's irrelevant here, because the law isn't based on damages.

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#125

> Simply paste our JavaScript snippet into your website's code. We'll check every visitor of your site and will block access to users located within the EU. See, the problem here is that you actually have to send an HTTP request to the site that's trying to block you, then you load it along with their JavaScript which then blocks you, but at that point the initial request(s) has already been logged and now they have…

> at that point the initial request(s) has already been logged and now they have to comply with the GDPR.

Are you referring to the IP address, which is personal data?

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#126
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What personal data are German bloggers gathering?

IP addresses, e-mail addresses from those who comment...

IP addresses alone are not personal data. They're only personal data if they can be used to identify a natural person.

If someone is gathering and storing email addresses and ip addresses it seems reasonable to ask them to take industry standard measures to protect that data, and to let users know that the data is being collected.

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#127
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IP addresses, e-mail addresses from those who comment...

IP addresses alone are not personal data. They're only personal data if they can be used to identify a natural person. If someone is gathering and storing email addresses and ip addresses it seems reasonable to ask them to take industry standard measures to protect that data, and to let users know that the data is being collected.

> IP addresses alone are not personal data.

According to the GDPR, they are. https://eugdprcompliant.com/personal-data/

"The conclusion is that the GDPR does consider it as such."

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#129
post #35
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not a joke :). GDPR Shield as a product is GDPR compliant. Customers sign a data processor agreement with the service. It anonymizes IP addresses, they aren't transferred to any other third-party provider and aren't stored.

But like I mentioned on Indie Hackers, your customers still have their own logs that need to be GDPR-compliant, which defeats the whole purpose. The page that requests your JS still has to be sent by a server, which will likely log the EU citizen’s IP. And then there’s the case where the EU citizen is using a VPN server in the US...

[deleted]

Re: GDPR compliance as a service

#130
post #98

This appears to be Javscript based... Assuming then that it works on the client side, I wonder how long it will take for someone to release a browser plugin to bypass it.

That's of course possible, but shouldn't matter: When you make a reasonable effort to block access to EU users, EU citizens aren't covered under GDPR if they take active measures (through a browser plugin, for example) to circumvent the ban: "This won't apply to every U.S. business — just the ones that are knowingly, and actively, conducting business in the EU. In this vein, EU courts have the discretionary ability t…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN