Live data from Hacker News

'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

cbc.ca

41–50 of 237 posts

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#41
post #36

Can anyone comment on the utility of mesh networks in rural areas, where the big ISPs say "Sorry, not interested", and the distances between potential nodes is high? I have read articles in the past about hardware hackers setting up systems to broadcast WiFi signals for exceptional distances. Could a system of mesh networks provide rural America (or other countries) with low cost / high speed internet service?

Point to point wireless links can definitely be used as long as you’ve got line of sight between the endpoints.

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#42
post #36

Can anyone comment on the utility of mesh networks in rural areas, where the big ISPs say "Sorry, not interested", and the distances between potential nodes is high? I have read articles in the past about hardware hackers setting up systems to broadcast WiFi signals for exceptional distances. Could a system of mesh networks provide rural America (or other countries) with low cost / high speed internet service?

I have set up wireless bridges that could supposedly under optimum conditions, connect to one another over 11 miles.

So with line of sight I know you could 'beam internet' from either a plain old ISP connection OR from an internet exchange.

This was consumer grade equipment too, I am sure there is much much stronger out there.

As far as the potential of mesh in rural areas, I think one of those two options should be workable. Of course there are costs and geography that may hinder.

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#43

This stuff is cool and maybe useful in far-fetched scenarios, but it's not going to replace ISPs anytime soon. Mesh networks don't make economic sense in most circumstances. Also, I'm guessing that users share the same IP address, which can cause problems. Plus, if one user is doing something illegal and causes the supernode to get shutdown then no one on the mesh network will have access to the internet. Addition: q…

> I'm guessing that users share the same IP address

I don’t see why that would be the case - you can give every user their own public IP directly. I would imagine they’re giving everyone an IPv6 /64 and a carrier-grade NAT for IPv4 (as it’s really hard for any new player to get usable amounts of IPv4 space).

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#44
post #12

Who's responsible when someone torrents copyrighted material through that Internet exchange point? "NYC Mesh will comply with all federal laws in the countries it operates, however, as policy, no data is collected and therefore no data exists to provide requestors." This is cute, but if you aren't hunting down people abusing the mesh, the whole connection to the internet will go away for a ToS violation.

I imagine it's not as bad as running a Tor exit node, which organizations like Noisebridge [1] seem to do without much issue (aside from the occasional visit from the FBI... [2]) 1. https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Tor 2. https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Tor/FBI

What is the agent's thought process on a visit like that? Do they not know what Tor is?

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#45

I'm in NYC. I know a few people who played with it. It barely works. I'm all for this kind of tech solutions, but for crying out loud pretending that this is a replacement for ISPs in NYC really discredits techies.

Why all the negativity? Isn't this tech in the early stages? Isn't there hope that these issues can be worked out? and in what way was it "barely working"?

I had at&t in one of SF's typically old buildings and I can tell you, the internet there barely worked - i had to reset the router about once a week, plus hour long downtimes not uncommon. Even now, when I'm in a brand new 3 year new townhouse, I still have a reset the router once or twice a year and I get half the speed I'm paying for on a DSL broadband plan, not to mention that I get stuck in a 12 month contract anytime i want to switch plans.

Considering that there are currently no other options than the att/comcast douopoly, I would think people would give a little more credit for providing alternatives, even if it's not perfect yet.

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#46
Actual ISP network engineer here: I'm sure these people are having fun and all, but it's insignificant in the larger scheme of things.

(correction to original post: I did not at first see an ASN for them, or announcements of their own IP space. They have an ASN and announce two /24s, and peer at one physical location in metro NYC).

Real five nines network infrastructure takes significant capital investment.

This part is so much unadulerated bullshit:

""The internet doesn't really cost you anything, it's just the connection [that has a fee]. So however you can get plugged in — then you're on the internet. Nobody owns the internet, there's no one to pay.""

Actual, reliable internet costs real money, both in the salaries of people to engineer and architect it, salaries for 24x7x365 clued-in NOC staff, equipment, salaries and expenses for field technicians to build it. And that's before you get into things like establishing colo at major IX points, serious core routers that cost $15k each (do you really want to deploy something in the year 2018 to take several full BGP tables that doesn't have a 4 million FIB capacity?), etc. The Internet is a significant construction project at OSI layer 1, whether you're putting PTP radios on rooftops, running aerial fiber, or underground fiber. Otherwise you're just piggybacking on something that another, larger entity has already built.

I give them an A for enthusiasm and effort. It just needs to be channeled the right way so that they can figure out what it actually costs to run a reliable ISP. I'm all in favor of new startup ISPs.

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#47
post #36

Can anyone comment on the utility of mesh networks in rural areas, where the big ISPs say "Sorry, not interested", and the distances between potential nodes is high? I have read articles in the past about hardware hackers setting up systems to broadcast WiFi signals for exceptional distances. Could a system of mesh networks provide rural America (or other countries) with low cost / high speed internet service?

In Catalunya we’ve had such a network for many years and it is specifically used for providing connectivity to rural parts of the country. It’s called Guifi.net and has over 30,000 nodes. I was surprised it wasn’t mentioned in the article actually.

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#48
This can work for small scale networks but it needs to be a paid service model to scale it(at least for usable performance).

A spine/leaf arch would be great for this imo. The leaves can be local cells of wifi networks. The spine can be operated by payment collecting individuals that maintain a high speed(10g+) and low latency uplink to the internet and network gear that can handle the traffic from the leaves. In spine leaf, leaves connect to multiple spine nodes as well (don't have to worry about spine operator reliability too much,could potentially load balance over spine)

That being said,I hope any modern wifi network assumes wifi encryption is not reliable and instead implements a layer2 or 3 tunnel (macsec/.11ae and wireguard respectively)

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#49

This stuff is cool and maybe useful in far-fetched scenarios, but it's not going to replace ISPs anytime soon. Mesh networks don't make economic sense in most circumstances. Also, I'm guessing that users share the same IP address, which can cause problems. Plus, if one user is doing something illegal and causes the supernode to get shutdown then no one on the mesh network will have access to the internet. Addition: q…

How are they at any greater risk than any other ISP?

Re: 'Anti-authority' tech rebels take on ISPs, connect NYC with cheap Wi-Fi

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why doesn't a startup run their own fibre? Are building owners that protective? Actually scratch that, I tried getting a 1 gig cross manhattan link. Cost more than 1g to London.

Building owners? Before you get anywhere near the buildings, you have to dig up the streets to run cabling around the city. Any idea how much that costs?

Speaking of London, talking to building owners is exactly what Hyperoptic did to build out a fibre network in London.

Unfortunately, the building owner where I used to live wasn't interested -- it turned out most of the building was empty, people keeping apartments for occasional visits or as an investment :-(

https://www.hyperoptic.com/how-hyperoptic-works/ or https://www.hyperoptic.com/map/

Post reply on HN