Live data from Hacker News

Rural Kansas is dying

newfoodeconomy.org

11–20 of 160 posts

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#11
The problem is quite direct: people do not wish to live there.

Getting 100 people to decide that town X is going to be their telecommute hub and doing it is simply not that hard to organize nowadays--if people actually wanted to do it.

The fact that nobody wants to do this says more than any amount of development initiatives.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#12
The Ogallala aquifer is only mentioned once in passing, but that's the real reason rural Kansas is dying. With the aquifer being completely depleted in some areas, conventional farming of the usual cash crops won't be an option for much longer. See http://www.kansascity.com/news/state/kansas/article28640722....

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#13

.

This doesn't seem entirely accurate - Minnesota and Iowa, for example, are crawling with well-respected private liberal arts colleges. The problem historically hasn't been producing an educated population, it has been keeping them there.

Kansas has more per capita college students than California.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#14
It's the Pareto principle. People go where they feel they will have more opportunities, and they take their economic activity with them.

Intra-national economic migrants are able to take their families with them, so they don't have the need to "send money home" the way so many international economic migrants do.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#15
post #6

As far as I'm aware, there's no procedure or help for the orderly shutdown of a locality that is no longer necessary for the greater community of any level of government. I'm not even aware of there being such procedures in place in other countries, let alone the US where this has context.

You mean in terms of governance, or the physical presence itself? For the presence, there are precedents. For example where small communities in e.g. Alaska get government assistance to move and merge into other communities nearby.

However those approaches seem to be taken very rarely, and you can imagine the attitudes of those residents who hold out.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#16
post #5

This is much less interesting than the rust belt decline or any other number of dying communities. Kansas used to need a lot more people to support farming and thus had enough people around for small towns to have a little life to them. Now they don't. It's a good thing that we can make so much food with fewer people, but it does mean even fewer people will live in rural agricultural communities. We love to romantici…

> This is much less interesting than the rust belt decline

Can you expand on this? Is it because you don't care about farmers in comparison to industrial workers, or is there a deeper meaning?

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#17
post #5

This is much less interesting than the rust belt decline or any other number of dying communities. Kansas used to need a lot more people to support farming and thus had enough people around for small towns to have a little life to them. Now they don't. It's a good thing that we can make so much food with fewer people, but it does mean even fewer people will live in rural agricultural communities. We love to romantici…

With the internet, small towns should be more viable in places like Kansas.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#18
The failed promise of telecommuting is a tragedy of the tech world. I'm a Kansan born and raised in the KC area (suburban rather than rural), and I wish a work-from-home career was more feasible in my line of work. I'd like nothing more than to live in a small Midwestern town; the city-hives hold no real attraction to me. The Internet should have freed more of us to live where we want, but in the most connected point in the world's history we're clustering in tech hubs.

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#19
post #6

As far as I'm aware, there's no procedure or help for the orderly shutdown of a locality that is no longer necessary for the greater community of any level of government. I'm not even aware of there being such procedures in place in other countries, let alone the US where this has context.

Cities can disincorporate when they run out of funds, or be disincorporated by the state when they are abandoned. In 2012, the State of Kansas officially disincorporated the city of Treece.[0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treece,_Kansas

Re: Rural Kansas is dying

#20
post #6

As far as I'm aware, there's no procedure or help for the orderly shutdown of a locality that is no longer necessary for the greater community of any level of government. I'm not even aware of there being such procedures in place in other countries, let alone the US where this has context.

this is a thing that exists, it's called "municipal disincorporation".
Post reply on HN