Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the battery would last for 5 mins.
Not if it weighs 20 lbs.
The myopia boom (2015)
31–40 of 73 posts
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#32Sunglasses are something else to consider. There is zero scientific evidence sunglasses protect your vision in any way. (There is suspicion UV exposure can lead to some eye diseases, but it's not a proven link, nor are the mechanisms understood). If increased exposure to sunlight is correlated with better vision, we better revisit our completely non-scientific sunglasses dogma.
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#33Sunglasses are something else to consider. There is zero scientific evidence sunglasses protect your vision in any way. (There is suspicion UV exposure can lead to some eye diseases, but it's not a proven link, nor are the mechanisms understood). If increased exposure to sunlight is correlated with better vision, we better revisit our completely non-scientific sunglasses dogma.
https://nei.nih.gov/news/briefs/uv_cataract
https://www.macular.org/ultra-violet-and-blue-light
Blue light from LEDs that are out of spec can also be a problem. The EU already has standards for this.
http://www.cree.com/led-components/media/documents/XLamp_Eye...
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#34Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#35Sunglasses are something else to consider. There is zero scientific evidence sunglasses protect your vision in any way. (There is suspicion UV exposure can lead to some eye diseases, but it's not a proven link, nor are the mechanisms understood). If increased exposure to sunlight is correlated with better vision, we better revisit our completely non-scientific sunglasses dogma.
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#36Sunglasses are something else to consider. There is zero scientific evidence sunglasses protect your vision in any way. (There is suspicion UV exposure can lead to some eye diseases, but it's not a proven link, nor are the mechanisms understood). If increased exposure to sunlight is correlated with better vision, we better revisit our completely non-scientific sunglasses dogma.
This is not scientific in any way. when I'm exposed to sunlight for a long period of time without sunglasses, at night my eyes hurt. I tend to think that pain is a way the body has to let you know something is not right.
I don't know if photokeratitis of the severity caused by normal outdoor activities has long-term consequences, but more severe UV exposure such as from welding without goggles can definitely cause permanent damage.
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#37Sunglasses are something else to consider. There is zero scientific evidence sunglasses protect your vision in any way. (There is suspicion UV exposure can lead to some eye diseases, but it's not a proven link, nor are the mechanisms understood). If increased exposure to sunlight is correlated with better vision, we better revisit our completely non-scientific sunglasses dogma.
This is not scientific in any way. when I'm exposed to sunlight for a long period of time without sunglasses, at night my eyes hurt. I tend to think that pain is a way the body has to let you know something is not right.
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#38Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#39I can only imagine the problem getting much worse in the future. Wherever I go, I see kids of all ages hooked on cell-phones - either on mobile games, youtube videos or on instagram/snapchat. This is probably significantly cutting down their natural light exposure.
Re: The myopia boom (2015)
#40Any article about myopia which doesn't mention anything about nutrition is "shortsighted" (pun intended). One of the most interesting discussions around causes for myopia is centered on nutrition, and how growing faster than our ancestors can negatively effect our vision. I looked for a specific reference to share here (something I've read years ago), but I didn't find it.
That's because what you eat has nothing to do with the shape of your eyeball, and there's no scientific basis for bringing this up in the context of myopia