Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Ian run a legit site, not phishing He originally had a site that looked extremely similar to stripe's official website: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16939094
I can't find any copies of that in any cache showing it was ever actually online, simply mocked-up photos posted to social media.
The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
71–80 of 89 posts
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#72Factoring in EV Certs for systems that are scanning the internet and trying to separate things that might need more validation...think news agencies and the search engines or social media that distribute their content. This illustrates both the benefit and the consequence of that model at the same time.
It would be ideal if there were some type of EV appeals committee to deal with revoked certs that could mandate a revoked EV be reinstated in a situation like this.
There is a place where using the EV model of more comprehensive verification can be beneficial...it's just not to the general public in a browser bar.
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't find any copies of that in any cache showing it was ever actually online, simply mocked-up photos posted to social media.
Posted by Ian himself. Why would he go to the trouble of mocking it up?
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#74Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#75The idea behind EV's (to tie domain ownership to real-world legal entities) is sound, it's just that the implementation is poor. If the EV badge identifies a legal entity plus its country of origin, then how is it supposed to be the CA's fault that there's this leaky abstraction of multiple legal entities with the same name in the same country? If we have a good idea and a poor implementation, then the correct respon…
The point is, nobody wants to fix it, because CAs are still making money.
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't find any copies of that in any cache showing it was ever actually online, simply mocked-up photos posted to social media.
Posted by Ian himself. Why would he go to the trouble of mocking it up?
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
By "site", are you referring to the actual site, or the EV indicator? Because the site itself doesn't look anything like Stripe's[1]. [1]: https://stripe.ian.sh/
The Tweet shows part of the site as identical to Stripe's: https://twitter.com/iangcarroll/status/940281927789146112 I think the current look was updated later.
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#78I agree with the fundamental conclusion that, due to changes in the Internet, CAs are quickly becoming arbiters of what content is valid or not in the public's eyes -- a job they aren't ready for and never asked for. The article linked goes about discussing this issue in a hyperbolic manner and it commits a few critical thinking mistakes despite arriving at a valid conclusion. Briefly, I'm going to focus on just one…
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#79On EV certs, Troy Hunt rightly pointed that no one really cares about them and many major websites (amazon, youtube, facebook) don't even bother: https://www.troyhunt.com/on-the-perceived-value-ev-certs-cas...
I care :-(
Re: The Power to Revoke Lies with the Certificate Authority
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Tweet shows part of the site as identical to Stripe's: https://twitter.com/iangcarroll/status/940281927789146112 I think the current look was updated later.
It was screenshots taken for the purposes of demonstration and wasn't his publicly hosted site. Do you think that he'd take that kind of risk?