I always thought Stack Overflow/Exchange should have a way to filter questions from users with less than a certain amount of karma and any of those questions/ansers/comments should not be able to be down voted or closed as duplicate or low quality or off-topic (the most annoying close reason). Anybody that gets annoyed by those questions can opt to not see them and focus on higher quality. Anyone that wants to help n…
Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
161–170 of 739 posts
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's significant though that both wikipedia and stack overflow, despite being ruled by petty assholes weilding the smallest amount of power in seemingly the stupidest way possible, have become two of the most valuable references in existence. Do toxic communities produce better content?
I would argue there are way too many variables in that question to present a strong argument either way. One thing I will say on it though is how much of our humanity are we ready to sacrifice on the altar of this mythical "meritocracy" that every online community, especially those built on or around code, seems to aim for? And how long until we're ready to confront the fact that a lot of these meritocracies strangel…
i don't mean to imply that we should preserve the toxic communities for the point of good content. but there seems to be a correlation here, and it's worth studying what positive effects the toxicity might create, otherwise it's going to be very difficult to re-create it without the toxicity and the sites that value the human creators over the content will always be at a natural disadvantage to the other sites.
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm kinda baffled by this complaint. [edit: OP has completely changed their post.] I'd think most new SO users are looking for help or a solution to a problem. Why was not being able to vote yet so upsetting you abandoned the resource?
I tried being part of the community
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#164> Too many people experience Stack Overflow¹ as a hostile or elitist place True. There's definitely an elitist undertone at Stack Overflow, and the voting system has a huge effect on that... > especially newer coders, women, people of color, and others in marginalized groups. But this isn't true. No one knows anything about a user on Stack Overflow unless they explicitly announce it, and generally my perception seems…
> But this isn't true. No one knows anything about a user on Stack Overflow unless they explicitly announce it,
They don't say it out in the open, they contact the SO admins directly or through surveys.
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#165It's funny reading this article after seeing one of my questions from 2011 edited today, to remove the word "Thanks!" from the bottom. I've been on SO since 2009. I can confirm the community is getting harsher, less patient, and more exact. HOWEVER, I can see the other side. I see tons of questions that are not fit to be on the site: one-liners, opinions, "help me with my homework", and utter spam. Not to mention peo…
Ratings already take care of curating. Why do you need assholes to curate?
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sneering comments from neckbeards are worse than downvotes to me. Some days are just Monday and you're not on your game, but that doesn't stop the neckbeards from trying to light you on fire, despite the fact that you spent 30 minutes massaging the question or half a day agonizing about asking the question. You know the neckbeards are lurking in their basements.
> "Sneering comments from neckbeards" Condescension, like any other dismissal, can be rough and is definitely detrimental to communication. That said, I encourage you to be the change you want to see. Name calling as you've done here, and snark, as you've done elsewhere in this thread, similarly degrade conversation and communication.
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read the comment from mistersquid https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16935683 to understand the point
That comment doesn't contradict my point at all. All it says is "Someone who has been bullied may interpret future slights as more of the same bullying." That has absolutely nothing to do with race or gender, and I still think it's for more insulting to imply that people in specific demographics are more sensitive or insecure.
The idea is not that they're 'fundamentally' more sensitive or insecure; it's that they're _empirically_ more sensitive and insecure, due to the circumstances of reality.
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#168Glad to see an active approach is being taken. SO is a great resource and contains some of the best information on the web IRT programming. If there was only one thing I could change it would be this: If someone marks a question as duplicate, and closes, make them provide a link to the 'original' question and a brief summary as to why it is a duplicate. Closing something as duplicate and then forcing the user who sub…
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#169From the linked article: > Too many people experience Stack Overflow as a hostile or elitist place, especially newer coders, women, people of color, and others in marginalized groups Breaking that down... "...people experience Stack Overflow as a hostile or elitist place..." This is obvious just by looking at the discussions that happen here, or, even by observing the SO-related memes that bubble up to the top of Red…
Everyone on HN is almost the same in my head.
I am not even sure adding a profile picture would change that.
Re: Stack Overflow Isn’t Very Welcoming – It’s Time for That to Change
#170It's funny reading this article after seeing one of my questions from 2011 edited today, to remove the word "Thanks!" from the bottom. I've been on SO since 2009. I can confirm the community is getting harsher, less patient, and more exact. HOWEVER, I can see the other side. I see tons of questions that are not fit to be on the site: one-liners, opinions, "help me with my homework", and utter spam. Not to mention peo…
A successful edit is a way to gain reputation, which is hard to get these days for new users.
I know it feels a bit odd when someone else edits your question: you could roll it back, but then again why should you be bothered? It's the same question, with one less word.