Live data from Hacker News

Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

qz.com

181–190 of 193 posts

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#181
post #89

I'm all for having more scooters parked on sidewalks and less Uber/Lyft vehicles blocking bike Lanes and adding to downtown traffic. The scooters are much needed, obviously. But, as usual, the media and city are crying about it and all you read in the news is "scooter mayhem" like this is the scooter apocalypse. Find something else to write and worry about, Jesus.

Scooters going painfully slow in bike lanes will not be terribly different from cars stopping in them. Either way, you have to merge into traffic to pass.

Not much different? A car is about 10x the width of the scooter. And bike lanes in the city are wide enough to allow passing within the bike lane if the slower traffic stays on one side.

https://twitter.com/BrentToderian/status/626511830261760000

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is the Old English meaning of the precursor word relevant? The modern word is road and it means thoroughfare.

Right. It's almost like the name of something has no bearing on what the thing could be used for.

In the case of sidewalk vs rad vs road, you're making the wrong argument.

We do not have "rads" anymore, we have "roads." "Road" is derived from "rad" but they are two different words with different meanings.

A sidewalk is a walking area on the side of a road, and that meaning of the word has not changed. Bikes, for example, or prohibited from sidewalks in most Western jurisdictions (lack of enforcement notwithstanding), and essentially all Western jurisdictions prohibit motorized vehicles from sidewalks. In both cases, it is because the sidewalks are meant for "pedestrians", i.e., people walking.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#183
post #40

Sort of an empty comparison to the automobile. Similar in the fact that it's being thrown out into the world without a plan, and there's no space for them, and there's an outcry. Different because they're a lot less deadly. The proliferation of private automobiles is a net negative for the world, so if these scooters displace (i.e. take away space from) cars, they're good. If they displace, hassle or inconvenience pe…

Electric scooters go the same speed range of 10-25mph. All of these relatively new electric mini-vehicles go as fast or faster than a bicycle. For stability reasons the sweet spot is about 10-15mph, which is the speed of a typical bicycle rider. Bike riders should see them as allies in getting better bike infrastructure, because they are pretty much equivalent.

Well there you go, I've never ridden one, and they don't have them around here, so that's a hopeful factoid. So maybe if a significant fraction of trips are being done in that speed range, there's a better chance of creating a space for it.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#184
post #5

I initially was bah humbugy about these scooters, but after reading an article that points out we have acres of space devoted to private automobiles, and that it really wouldn't be hard to accommodate these electric scooters, I changed my mind. They look fun, they seem more flexible than the hard-wired go-bike stations, and they don't seem super expensive. It's pretty obvious that our cities are broken, and SF needs…

Related:

some before and after in the netherlands https://twitter.com/schlijper/status/987269913311137797

I do like roads a bit, when it's where kids can play and also have some cars at times. But the green/bike version has a lot to offer. It's relaxing just by looking at it.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#185
post #5

I initially was bah humbugy about these scooters, but after reading an article that points out we have acres of space devoted to private automobiles, and that it really wouldn't be hard to accommodate these electric scooters, I changed my mind. They look fun, they seem more flexible than the hard-wired go-bike stations, and they don't seem super expensive. It's pretty obvious that our cities are broken, and SF needs…

It’s insane how we don’t even notice how much public space is devoted to cars: For a typical residential street, it’s 2/3: two lanes of traffic, two lanes for parking, vs two sidewalks. All are about the same width. That primacy of the car is what needs to change. Autonomous driving could go a long way, by allowing offside parking and increased utilization of shared cars. But even before, just inconveniencing drivers…

Yes, absolutely! I was just saying this on another thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16934196 There is so much space needed to accommodate the everyone-in-a-car model. The space for active use is only one part of it; where to put them when they're idle is a problem unto itself.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#186

Replace these scooters with bicycles and all of the same issues apply. Imagine if real self locking bicycles were somehow theft proof and private citizens started putting their bicycles willy nilly everywhere. That is the only new issue that is generated by these companies, and creating more parking for bikes and other low speed vehicles is the eventual solution. The fact that these dockless bike companies have effec…

Not sure how much of it is that they're theft-proof vs anyone who wants to steal one either already has or doesn't care enough to do so. You could e.g. line the inside of a U-Haul with RF-blocking material and load up a ton of these, strip the radios in there, and sell them, but if you were to try this at a large enough scale it would likely be worth them going after you. If they lose a few here and there it's probab…

It's 'theft proof' as in insurance. You don't have to worry about it being 'stolen' from you or damaged because your only responsible for it when your using it.

It's not real theft & vandalism-proof, but it effectively is.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#187
post #177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>stop if you need to If you're on a 45mph road and someone puts themselves in your path 10 feet ahead, no, we don't say that you should have actually been going 5mph just in case something like this was going to happen. You're required to yield at crosswalks, but there's an expectation that mutual acknowledgement between you and the pedestrian happens at a reasonable distance before the pedestrian enters the roadway.…

you can tell beforehand that its possible for somebody to suddenly jump out, so yes, you probably should be going 5mph

It's always possible for someone to enter the road, even a restricted-access freeway.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

walking 3-4, scooter 10-15, cars 25-60. each is about 3x more than the previous. But it's a stupid comparison for safety. Colliding with a scooter will rarely be fatal, regardless of the 3x. But cyclist often get killed.

Arguing "Sure bikes will hit you, but it will rarely be fatal!" is not terribly convincing. Its reasonable for pedestrians to want bikes off the sidewalk. The chance of collision is far greater. I know its a hard statistic for bikes to swallow. There seems to be no winning for them. But that's my whole point.

so we're willing to kill people because we want to avoid bumps and bruises?

Seems fucked up.

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As for the self righteousness of "only peds belong on sidewalks", I get tired of that Nothing self-righteous about that. Sidewalks are -- as the name itself suggests - meant for WALKING on the SIDE of the road, not for riding scooters and other vehicles which pose a danger to other people walking. Only exception being people on wheelchairs, but they aren't driving at break-neck speeds like an electric scooter rider…

The problem with this is that it's the same attitude as the car drivers have about "their" roads. If we listen to the drivers who say nobody but cars should ever be on the road, and the peds who say nobody but pedestrians should ever be on the sidewalk, what's left for cyclists, scooters, or any other form of transit?

> If we listen to the drivers who say nobody but cars should ever be on the road.

It's not drivers who say this, but the Law. Ever heard of 'Jaywalking' Tickets?

Re: Electric scooter “mayhem” sounds like when cars were introduced

#190
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The chance of collision should also be considered. Since intersection collisions are the same or worse for riding a bicycle on the sidewalk, we should consider overtaking while there is insufficient space which seems like it would be a strong function of extra space on either the road or the sidewalk and relative speeds. Im not sure why you listed 60 as I'm not really aware of any roads with such a limit that also re…

All the roads around my house have a 55 limit. If I didn't bike on them I wouldn't bike at all.

Wow. Is this Arizona?
Post reply on HN