Unpopular opinion: if your company is going to succeed, why do you need VC? Sure, (nearly) every really really big company pulled VC at some point, but this is an industry full of survivor bias - and VC's know full well that almost all their punts are going to fail. VC is, arguably, the most expensive money you will ever borrow. If you could borrow a couple of hundred K against, say, obscene house prices in San Franc…
> If your company is going to succeed, why do you need VC?
It's not just the VC but also the definition of success. Nowadays I see this mostly defined as being able to scale up quickly to - preferably - millions of users, and raking in loads of revenue in short time.
But why not have modest goals in mind to define success? Get decent, normal salaries for the initial team of employees, instead of striving to become rich. Then grow slowly and steadily.. you won't need VC at all that way, if you plan things right.
Scrap the word 'disruption' from your business plan. It originally had a negative connotation anyway. Go for sustainability in the holistic meaning of the word..
(PS. I like the use the term 'anti-disruption-layer' in these modern times.. trying to create one)