Can I access this API externally, e.g. by sending a http get request to some endpoint, to get the summary content in JSON format?
Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
21–30 of 255 posts
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#22Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#23> People seem to like it — we are seeing 5,000 hits to our API a minute to serve those cards that show when you hover over any link. Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. > The original idea was conceived four years ago When I was active at Wikipedia/Wikibooks 12 years ago, there was a user script floating around that did the sam…
When you evaluate features using engagement metrics, there are only two possibilities. If the metric is high, users love the feature. If the metric is low, users don't know the feature exists, and more alerts or "unread" badges must be added to help them learn.
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#24> People seem to like it — we are seeing 5,000 hits to our API a minute to serve those cards that show when you hover over any link. Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. > The original idea was conceived four years ago When I was active at Wikipedia/Wikibooks 12 years ago, there was a user script floating around that did the sam…
According to https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm , English Wikipedia gets 88K views per minute.
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#25> People seem to like it — we are seeing 5,000 hits to our API a minute to serve those cards that show when you hover over any link. Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. > The original idea was conceived four years ago When I was active at Wikipedia/Wikibooks 12 years ago, there was a user script floating around that did the sam…
It soon became known as Navigation Popups[2], and is still available today.
The main documentation for Page Previews mentions Navigation Popups.[3]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lupin/popups.js
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation_pop...
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#26https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
for desktop these days.
I much prefer it to the standard version.
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#27I am continually impressed by the markup Wikipedia generates. They've managed to pull in pretty link previews, scientific notation and a grid layout, whilst building a highly nested markup structure? The remarkable part? Wikipedia works great inside a text browser like elinks. It works great in a modern browser. Without sacrificing the interactivity people have grown to expect.
Wikipedia's markup is just terrible for trying to do any sort of scraping or analysis. I once tried to write a script that pulled the latest version of macOS from the sidebar of this article[1] and I gave up because it was difficult and brittle in a way that made it nearly impossible. I'd probably have better results parsing the HTML with a regex. Likewise, I know a friend who literally had to scrap an entire project…
As for scraping... Parsing the hell that is wikitext is all you can do. Or apparently, pipe it through a text browser.
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#28> People seem to like it — we are seeing 5,000 hits to our API a minute to serve those cards that show when you hover over any link. Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. > The original idea was conceived four years ago When I was active at Wikipedia/Wikibooks 12 years ago, there was a user script floating around that did the sam…
Also, is 5K hits/minute really that impressive? According to https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm , English Wikipedia gets 88K views per minute.
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#29Wow. Had just read that and then saw the feature first time while browsing over a list page. Was moving my curser down the list and when ever I wanted to click a link, the above link hat popped up the layer, highjacking my click and leading me to the wrong page. What a great way of destroying the user experience with a beautifully over-engineered feature that is utterly crap while actually trying to use the underlyin…
Re: Why it took a long time to build the tiny link preview on Wikipedia
#30> People seem to like it — we are seeing 5,000 hits to our API a minute to serve those cards that show when you hover over any link. Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. > The original idea was conceived four years ago When I was active at Wikipedia/Wikibooks 12 years ago, there was a user script floating around that did the sam…
> Uhm, no. It just means that people are hovering over links with their mouse. It does not imply any opinion about the previews. When you evaluate features using engagement metrics, there are only two possibilities. If the metric is high, users love the feature. If the metric is low, users don't know the feature exists, and more alerts or "unread" badges must be added to help them learn.