Live data from Hacker News

Smugmug Acquires Flickr

smugmug.com

151–160 of 238 posts

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#151
I remember a time when Flickr tried an in-browser photo editor tool. Is it still there? If so, burn it with fire. Such featuritis, wasting time and effort to ape functionalities of well established native applications.

I’d suggest integration with native desktop applications, automated tagging with area crop (trivial these days), doubling down on IRL communities (Meetup wasn’t ever awarded a patent for that, no?)

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#153
Does this mean Flickr is no longer part of the Yahoo/Oath (I have to give them kudos for having the courage to call themselves "Oath" despite what they do) privacy nightmare? I've been looking for am Instagram alternative that respects my privacy and I'm happy to pay good money for it.

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#154
I'm intrigued at how the existing Flickr was kept alive. This thread notes most previously paying members - no longer are. I've never heard a marketing person talking about "advertising on Flickr". So income is low.

Meanwhile, storage and bandwidth are two of the more expensive things around.

Turning things around could as this thread suggests could greatly improve the income. But again, I feel surprised there was a Flickr still around to acquire.

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#156

By the way, if you are a Flickr user, then you control what I see on my television. By "television" I mean the screen and Apple TV, which is the only television I have. And I went into the settings and set "Most Popular on Flickr" as my screensaver. So I've often fallen asleep watching whatever images you have upvoted. The one feature I hope Smugmug adds is captions. I often see incredible nature photos, and I've no…

In a similar vein, I watch the Netflix screensaver quite a lot, or is it the Amazon Firestick screensaver ... either way, it's not a thing I'd ever have thought to install, but the images from around the world are beautiful and add a sort of contemplative calm to the day.

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#157

On the one hand, I'm happy that Flickr will stay alive but on the other, I'm worried about what Smugmug will do to it regarding policy. Smugmug's Acceptable Use Policy [0] is rather puritan, forbidding things that are "indecent", "lewd", "sexually suggestive" or anything else that "in the sole judgment of SmugMug, is objectionable, harmful". Flickr's [1] on the other hand is rather accepting: "If you would hesitate t…

Is it ideals or is it market placement? If they're staying separate then I imagine maximum market coverage means having a split where they maintain the family friendly visage of SmugMug and they keep the wide gamut of photography on Flickr.

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#158
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> at Yahoo they never quite knew what to do Isn't that true for Yahoo in general? They kinda stumbled upon being internet giant, and have been utterly confused on what to do next ever after.

For sure. Flickr wasn't the only company Yahoo mismanaged.

Some of the highest paid people ever, being handed incomes equivalent to a developing world country. I'd have trashed Yahoo for half of that!

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#159
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These article writers miss the mark (IMHO) by comparing Flickr to Facebook and Instagram. Those instant gratification platforms ruin photos by sub-sampling uploads. When I share my photos on Flickr (pro account), they’re available in full resolution. Yes FB and Insta compete with Flickr for eyeballs, but for real photography sharing, there is no competition there. Flickr wins. If anything, SmugMug is (was) competing…

Yes I was confused when I recently started uploading to Instagram that I couldn't find a way to view photos at 100%. But in a way that's clever; I think reflects their intention to capture spontaneous moments, regardless of technical merit. You can't zoom-in to be wowed by 50MP of detail and thus it puts everyone on the same level, regardless of tools, and focuses them on composition and timing.

is there really a need to force everybody to the same level? I don’t think that it is a competition, people just share their moments. why equalize everybody’s photos to same crappy quality?

Re: Smugmug Acquires Flickr

#160
I very actively use Flickr since 2006 and here is my feedback:

- As a photographer, I enjoy photography on desktop computers rather than mobile screens. This is why I prefer Flickr over Instagram.

- Delete the Yahoo login please.

- Bring back the community feeling. I used to check Flickr blog every week to see what is going on in the Flickr community.

- Simplify the product please. I think Flickr is great at organizing photos but it's not ideal for following photographers.

- Usernames are a mess. Let's say your username was "bob" when you registered as a Flickr user. Later, Yahoo Flickr renamed usernames as "handle" and introduced another username. Please unify usernames and handles and make it simple again.

Best of luck. I hope Flickr's destiny won't be like Delicious.

Post reply on HN