Live data from Hacker News

Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

metropolitan.fi

61–70 of 147 posts

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#61
post #54
post #7

All they're doing is looking for bank transactions to crypto exchanges in citizens' accounts. What this article doesn't tell, is that the current cryptocurrency taxation in Finland is unreasonable. You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. If you had bought 1 BTC at $1000, another at $14000, and sold both at $3000 you would owe $600 in taxes even though you lost $9000. You can imagine how peopl…

I'm skeptical of this, and went looking for primary sources. The Finnish tax authority website seems to have a different example: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fi&tl=en&js=y&prev... (from https://www.vero.fi/syventavat-vero-ohjeet/ohje-hakusivu/484... ) "Example 1: One person has in the past bought 1,000 bitcoins for 500 euros, ie one Bitcoin cost EUR 0.5. He later bought more 500 bitcoins for 500 euros,…

The third example lays out a situation where the loss is not deductable even though it is a real loss.

What worries me more is that this is an "instruction", but the tax authorities are not bound by instructions. And they are known to do as they want, even flouting European law (particularly when it is to do with car taxes, although not so much related to bitcoins.).

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#62
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm skeptical of this, and went looking for primary sources. The Finnish tax authority website seems to have a different example: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fi&tl=en&js=y&prev... (from https://www.vero.fi/syventavat-vero-ohjeet/ohje-hakusivu/484... ) "Example 1: One person has in the past bought 1,000 bitcoins for 500 euros, ie one Bitcoin cost EUR 0.5. He later bought more 500 bitcoins for 500 euros,…

The third example lays out a situation where the loss is not deductable even though it is a real loss. What worries me more is that this is an "instruction", but the tax authorities are not bound by instructions. And they are known to do as they want, even flouting European law (particularly when it is to do with car taxes, although not so much related to bitcoins.).

[deleted]

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#63
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is even worse if you are a student who receives government aids: transactions are regarded as income (whether loss or profit) by the social insurance institution. So in other words, if you buy Bitcoin for 1000 euros and sell it at 500, you have made efficiently 500 euros in "income." With the notion of the parent post, this makes trading unviable, because if you exceed 12K€ in income a year (in any form, be that…

If one is a student who receives government aid, maybe one shouldn't be speculating in crypto-currencies.

You do realize that many students spend a portion of their income on beer and pizza even while getting government aid. I can't say crypto currency is any better, but whatever.

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#64

I'm pretty sure all bitcoin fanatics are going balls out on this one..

Bitcoin proponents like to stress the rationality of their investments and deny that it is gambling or an asset only fit for the black market - hence the large potential. So they surely would take taxation into account.

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#65
post #7

All they're doing is looking for bank transactions to crypto exchanges in citizens' accounts. What this article doesn't tell, is that the current cryptocurrency taxation in Finland is unreasonable. You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. If you had bought 1 BTC at $1000, another at $14000, and sold both at $3000 you would owe $600 in taxes even though you lost $9000. You can imagine how peopl…

Just because you think a law is unreasonable, doesn't mean it does not apply. It might be unreasonable, but you still have to pay (or relocate, or find a loophole around it)

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#66

It sort of sounds like they're treating Bitcoin transactions like a non-EEA lottery. If you win, you pay your taxes, and if you lose you don't get to deduct the cost of your ticket. Honestly, this doesn't bother me.

Do you also get taxed if paid in bitcoin

Why not just do a 10% wealth tax on all of a person's assets on top of their income tax

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#67
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jesus, you can’t deduct losses? If it is only for crypto, I gotta believe its a perverse way to dissuade citizens from investing in crypto. These crypto tax articles become less and less relevant in the coming tax year as people are going to be filing losses , not gains. I expect headlines like “How to make sure you add up your crypto losses to the full amount”

> investing in crypto LOL

Crypto is a legitimate investment. It's an entirely new asset class. If you think it's going away anytime soon you're delusional. 5 years ago you could buy 1 BTC for $100 USD. And at that point it wasn't even new. 1 year ago you could buy 1 ETH for about $50.

The average person would struggle very hard to find any investment that goes 80X in 5 years, or 12X in one year. With Bitcoin and crypto, lots of regular people have made returns they could never dream of on the stock market.

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#68
post #59
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is. Net profits are not taxed, but the profits of any profitable trade are. Trades resulting in loss are ignored. The tax authorities interpreted cryptocurrencies not as a currency or as a financial asset, but as "trade agreements", which allowed them to take this stance. I'm not sure why they would skew the taxation so far against taxpayers' favor.

> but the profits of any profitable trade are. Trades resulting in loss are ignored. Kind of like lottery winnings are taxed where they are taxed. Or is there a country that not only taxes lottery wins but also makes lottery tickets a deductible expense?

It's an interpretation which might or might not be correct. If you are living in Finland and believe that this is incorrect, then you are free to go to court and make your case to a judge as to why the tax authority is wrong.

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#69
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That doesn't sound right. The authorities in Finland specifically tax gains made with cryptocurrencies. You only pay tax if you make profit on any individual trade. But you can not deduct trades that made a loss. It's not exactly a wealth tax, but it's also hard to consider a capital gains tax because you can't deduct losses. Treating other investment products this way would probably have horrific results, because it…

If you buy stocks in a publicly traded Finnish company, then you're taking on a risk in the hope of making a profit. But you are also putting your money at work in the Finnish economy, stimulating job creation and growth. Everybody wins, hopefully. If, on the other hand, you put down your money in bitcoin or at the online blackjack tables then you're gambling, not investing. Win or lose, your gamble creates zero dome…

What if you were to invest in a publicly traded non-Finnish company, let's say Apple? How do you think the government should treat that?

Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers

#70
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. Whether you made a profit or not doesn't have to be a consideration as far as tax goes. You pay a percentage of the capital amount when you choose to liquidate your asset. It's effectively a wealth tax. There are lots of taxes around the world that work this way. It sucks if you've made a loss, but that's not really the government's problem.

Wait... How is the inability to deduct losses OK in any government? Yes, you have to pay taxes on the gains when you liquidate but you can offset that with any losses too

In Finland you are required by law to name your children one of the 100 approved Finnish boy or girl names (there is an exception for ethnic minorities)

Imagine such a law in UK or USA.

Finland is a bit more "special" than other countries.

Post reply on HN