I'm pretty sure all bitcoin fanatics are going balls out on this one..
Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
31–40 of 147 posts
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is even worse if you are a student who receives government aids: transactions are regarded as income (whether loss or profit) by the social insurance institution. So in other words, if you buy Bitcoin for 1000 euros and sell it at 500, you have made efficiently 500 euros in "income." With the notion of the parent post, this makes trading unviable, because if you exceed 12K€ in income a year (in any form, be that…
Whilst the apparent double counting doesn't seem fair, it also doesn't seem like a good idea for students who rely on government aid for their living costs to be speculating in risky exotic financial assets...
If we "can't afford" to offer a program to all qualifying people regardless of income that means we don't have the political will to make the program happen and should get rid of it.
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#33All they're doing is looking for bank transactions to crypto exchanges in citizens' accounts. What this article doesn't tell, is that the current cryptocurrency taxation in Finland is unreasonable. You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. If you had bought 1 BTC at $1000, another at $14000, and sold both at $3000 you would owe $600 in taxes even though you lost $9000. You can imagine how peopl…
You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. Whether you made a profit or not doesn't have to be a consideration as far as tax goes. You pay a percentage of the capital amount when you choose to liquidate your asset. It's effectively a wealth tax. There are lots of taxes around the world that work this way. It sucks if you've made a loss, but that's not really the government's problem.
No, it's a 30-34% wealth tax! (Or better, transaction tax.)
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. Whether you made a profit or not doesn't have to be a consideration as far as tax goes. You pay a percentage of the capital amount when you choose to liquidate your asset. It's effectively a wealth tax. There are lots of taxes around the world that work this way. It sucks if you've made a loss, but that's not really the government's problem.
That doesn't sound right. The authorities in Finland specifically tax gains made with cryptocurrencies. You only pay tax if you make profit on any individual trade. But you can not deduct trades that made a loss. It's not exactly a wealth tax, but it's also hard to consider a capital gains tax because you can't deduct losses. Treating other investment products this way would probably have horrific results, because it…
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#35Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#36Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#37All they're doing is looking for bank transactions to crypto exchanges in citizens' accounts. What this article doesn't tell, is that the current cryptocurrency taxation in Finland is unreasonable. You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. If you had bought 1 BTC at $1000, another at $14000, and sold both at $3000 you would owe $600 in taxes even though you lost $9000. You can imagine how peopl…
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whilst the apparent double counting doesn't seem fair, it also doesn't seem like a good idea for students who rely on government aid for their living costs to be speculating in risky exotic financial assets...
This is kind of off topic but we should really get rid of all income thresholds for government services and safety nets. They divide people and make them resent one another. I think we should instead make these programs available to all otherwise qualifying applicants (New York excelsior can keep the state residency requirement but should not be allowed to say it applies only to people who make under $125k a year). I…
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty trivial for a nation state, given sufficient motivation.
Not if it's something like Monero.
Re: Finland tax authorities matching Bitcoin transactions and bank transfers
#40All they're doing is looking for bank transactions to crypto exchanges in citizens' accounts. What this article doesn't tell, is that the current cryptocurrency taxation in Finland is unreasonable. You pay 30-34% tax on any profit, but you can not deduct losses. If you had bought 1 BTC at $1000, another at $14000, and sold both at $3000 you would owe $600 in taxes even though you lost $9000. You can imagine how peopl…
Either way, it would make sense to tax cryptocurrency trading by using the same tax code as other kinds of overseas online gambling.