Live data from Hacker News

Poll: Sequel or S-Q-L?

news.ycombinator.com

91–100 of 134 posts

Re: Poll: Sequel or S-Q-L?

#92
post #70

Number of syllables is the key factor. Sequel = 2 syllables. S-Q-L = 3. Sequel wins. Flows much better in conversation that way too.

This reminds me of the amusing trivia that it is faster to say "world wide web" than "WWW".

Re: Poll: Sequel or S-Q-L?

#94
post #76

Pronunciation discrepancies are common in this field. How do you pronounce "char"? Or "cout" and "cin"? C++ was the first language I learned and I did so entirely through books, so I came up with my own pronunciations for everything. It wasn't until years later that I went to college and for the first time heard other people saying these terms orally. It was quite a shock to hear my professor say "char" (as in "charc…

care, c-out, c-in

It took me years to switch from 'jif' for 'gif' with a hard G. I finally gave up because it seemed like I was the only one.

Re: Poll: Sequel or S-Q-L?

#98
post #26

This poll contains 327+271 votes, yet has only 59 points. Worth voting in, but not up.

Do you really think this poll should be worth >500 points? (Now >1000)? I voted to count my opinion for the OP, but I would hardly recommend it as being "intellectually stimulating".

Re: Poll: Sequel or S-Q-L?

#100
post #92
post #70

Number of syllables is the key factor. Sequel = 2 syllables. S-Q-L = 3. Sequel wins. Flows much better in conversation that way too.

This reminds me of the amusing trivia that it is faster to say "world wide web" than "WWW".

I've heard some radio ads render it "triple W", which flows pretty nicely.
Post reply on HN