I think the main issues with all of these rasbi alternatives is the software. As ... quirky ... as the rasbi is, the software support and optimisation is excellent. There are several speed comparisons on youtube where the rasbi beats a lot of the competition through sheer software optimisation. Honestly, without complete Upstream Kernel support and Open Sourcing of all necessary drivers, none of these Boards is reall…
Allwinner based boards have mainline kernel support for most features, they're one of a handful of vendors that has mainline support (primarily due to community efforts). I personally like the OrangePi boards due to price & reliability, easy to set and forget without worrying about mSD corruption. http://linux-sunxi.org/Main_Page is pretty useful for a list of boards and info.
The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
31–40 of 232 posts
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#32I think the main issues with all of these rasbi alternatives is the software. As ... quirky ... as the rasbi is, the software support and optimisation is excellent. There are several speed comparisons on youtube where the rasbi beats a lot of the competition through sheer software optimisation. Honestly, without complete Upstream Kernel support and Open Sourcing of all necessary drivers, none of these Boards is reall…
Allwinner based boards have mainline kernel support for most features, they're one of a handful of vendors that has mainline support (primarily due to community efforts). I personally like the OrangePi boards due to price & reliability, easy to set and forget without worrying about mSD corruption. http://linux-sunxi.org/Main_Page is pretty useful for a list of boards and info.
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#33Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#34Is there a reason why everybody just HAS to stick to the RPi's when the BeagleBone Black/Green/Blue/etc. are: 1) Far more open (you can get documentation and chip supply to build your own BeagleBone) 2) No more expensive 3) Mainline Debian
2) Hasn't been updated in a while; thus
3) Lower RAM;
4) Lower perf;
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#35Is there a reason why everybody just HAS to stick to the RPi's when the BeagleBone Black/Green/Blue/etc. are: 1) Far more open (you can get documentation and chip supply to build your own BeagleBone) 2) No more expensive 3) Mainline Debian
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#36I think the main issues with all of these rasbi alternatives is the software. As ... quirky ... as the rasbi is, the software support and optimisation is excellent. There are several speed comparisons on youtube where the rasbi beats a lot of the competition through sheer software optimisation. Honestly, without complete Upstream Kernel support and Open Sourcing of all necessary drivers, none of these Boards is reall…
https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/open-source-hardwa...
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#37Are you able to use the GPU with OMXplayer (do the drivers work) ?
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#38Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Allwinner based boards have mainline kernel support for most features, they're one of a handful of vendors that has mainline support (primarily due to community efforts). I personally like the OrangePi boards due to price & reliability, easy to set and forget without worrying about mSD corruption. http://linux-sunxi.org/Main_Page is pretty useful for a list of boards and info.
What makes Allwinner based boards less likely to have mSD corruption over others?
Re: The ASUS Tinker Board is a compelling upgrade from a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
#40Whether or not ever more powerful Raspberry Pi computers is a good thing depends on why you are using them. If you're wanting to put it to some practical application then probably more power is better. If, like me, it's a hobby, and you enjoy the idea of tiny machines, and the challenge of pushing a computer to do things a resource constrained environment, then tiny and powerful machines like RPi that can run full Li…
While I agree with you, ESP32 is over 1000 times more powerful than C64 and has more RAM than unexpanded Amiga 500. (Can't wait when my ESP32 arrives in mail soon. :-))
Doom for ESP32 (running from RAM connected over SPI of all things...!): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb_JFDa0AIo