Live data from Hacker News

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

cloudplatform.googleblog.com

1–10 of 108 posts

Re: Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

#3
post #2

Finally! Nice to see more PG support. Any news about PostgreSQL 10 support?

I asked that yesterday in a meeting with my gcloud rep, they said all work has gone into getting to GA, and once that is done, look for them to start doing things like updating, more new features, etc.

Re: Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

#4
post #3
post #2

Finally! Nice to see more PG support. Any news about PostgreSQL 10 support?

I asked that yesterday in a meeting with my gcloud rep, they said all work has gone into getting to GA, and once that is done, look for them to start doing things like updating, more new features, etc.

[deleted]

Re: Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

#5
Has anyone used the beta and got any feeling for how maintenance downtime impacts things? A bit nervous about how you can only set a "maintenance window" and not be able to plan ahead for disruption; as far as I can tell, they won't even tell you ahead of time. The HA seems really solid (zero-lag "regional disks"), but it's still a bit disconcerting.

Re: Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

#7

Has anyone used the beta and got any feeling for how maintenance downtime impacts things? A bit nervous about how you can only set a "maintenance window" and not be able to plan ahead for disruption; as far as I can tell, they won't even tell you ahead of time. The HA seems really solid (zero-lag "regional disks"), but it's still a bit disconcerting.

There is disruption yes. It's usually short however we always see retries in our logs for a few minutes. Our app doesn't need perfect uptime though and we haven't tried the HA setup.

Re: Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL now generally available

#9

Has anyone used the beta and got any feeling for how maintenance downtime impacts things? A bit nervous about how you can only set a "maintenance window" and not be able to plan ahead for disruption; as far as I can tell, they won't even tell you ahead of time. The HA seems really solid (zero-lag "regional disks"), but it's still a bit disconcerting.

Unfortunately last time I used CloudSQL for MySQL it was incredibly unstable. They would take down our master AND standby at the same time for maintenance. When we filed a ticket they just said it was a known bug with no plans to fix.

A major client of mine migrated to AWS because of this and other issues.

Post reply on HN