Incidents like this are starting to make me feel that software engineers should have a code of ethics, similar to the Hippocratic Oath. So technologies aren't abused to marginalize individuals/groups.
Not to put a damper on things, but it's not like the Hippocratic oath means anything as attested by[1]. It's only good if people heed it, otherwise it's meaningless. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_...
Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
21–30 of 85 posts
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#22Where in the article does it say that Weibo is backing down? All it seems to say is "backlash happened".
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/world/asia/china-weibo-ga...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/16/china-weibo-ba...
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#23Where in the article does it say that Weibo is backing down? All it seems to say is "backlash happened".
Agreed. We changed the title to that of the actual article. Submitted title was "China's Weibo backs down from censoring gay content following backlash". Submitters: rewriting titles like that is a violation of the site guidelines. If the facts have changed since the article was written, you can explain that by posting a comment about it to the thread, or by finding a more up-to-date article and submitting that. http…
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't really make it better.
In fact i'd say it makes it worse.
Profitable, lucrative, serious business. Every branch of government want its own little kill-switch button. e.g. 舆情系统. Lobbyist plays a key roll in all this.
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#25Incidents like this are starting to make me feel that software engineers should have a code of ethics, similar to the Hippocratic Oath. So technologies aren't abused to marginalize individuals/groups.
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#26I was in Fujian, China, two weeks ago and did a Bing web/image search for ‘gay men’ (unrelated to any of this news). Zero results returned, and a standard note about violent and sexually explicit content being censored. Thought that was odd.
If there is no sexual content in the photo, what would be the difference in a picture of a gay or straight man? They would look the same.
By specifying sexual orientation you are by definition requesting sexual content.
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. We changed the title to that of the actual article. Submitted title was "China's Weibo backs down from censoring gay content following backlash". Submitters: rewriting titles like that is a violation of the site guidelines. If the facts have changed since the article was written, you can explain that by posting a comment about it to the thread, or by finding a more up-to-date article and submitting that. http…
See my other reply, there are articles that explicitly say that it actually happened. See other reply for links. Perhaps change the link instead?
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
In fact i'd say it makes it worse.
Another fun fact: censorship is a business in China. Profitable, lucrative, serious business. Every branch of government want its own little kill-switch button. e.g. 舆情系统. Lobbyist plays a key roll in all this.
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#29Incidents like this are starting to make me feel that software engineers should have a code of ethics, similar to the Hippocratic Oath. So technologies aren't abused to marginalize individuals/groups.
You have to be careful with this. Ethics can also be used to discriminate against people for religious reasons. These people think they are as ethical as you think you are.
Re: Chinese Social Media Site Reverses Gay Content Ban After Uproar
#30Western media intends to portrait "china" as one single top-down entity, but as a matter of fact it's not. There are thousands of bureaucratic federal or local government branches can start an Internet crackdown. The whole "anti-gay" nonscence might came from a office clerk smashing his head for April KPI campaigns and baidu'd for random shit to block and passed through the chain of command. That's it.
Are you saying this article does that? I don't see anything in it that does. Can you quote me anything in it that does?
> There are thousands of bureaucratic federal or local government branches can start an Internet crackdown.
You seem to be wanting to imply that this precludes the existence of attempts that come from a higher level.