Live data from Hacker News

NirSoft Freeware (2008)

nirsoft.net

111–120 of 241 posts

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#111

I'm confused why NirSoft software is not open source. I've always seen open source as easier than doing all the work on your own.

I've sent a few emails to Nir asking to license a few of his applications, not no replies.

Open sourcing the entire thing with both a decent license would be great.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#112

> While many software companies create a bloated installation package with size of 1 - 3 MB, the size of single utility in NirSoft is usually less than 100KB. The early 2000s were a different time. While as modern day electron apps are regularly 100+ MB.

Around 2000, I had a laptop with 5g of harddisk and 64mb of ram, now I'm at ~1tb and 16gb ram. Roughly a 200x increase in raw numbers, though lots of other things since then make the actual increase larger, so it sounds like we're using net-smaller apps :)

The last time I noticed a real performance increase was going from HDD to SSD. I mean, I do also ask a lot more of my machine than 10 or 15 years ago so it probably balances out.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Malware authors often incorporate legitimate software into their malware - e.g. Nir Sofer's Mail PassView and Web PassView are used in Emotet spam bot to harvest user credentials. Usually such files are marked as "Potentially unsafe software" by analysts, or in some cases could be detected as part of a malware family by AV companies' automated detection tools.

Another thing is that actions malware take and actions legitimate "power user" software takes are separated only by context. Thus automated behavior analysis is always going to produce false positives.

Is there much behaviour analysis done by consumer AV? Even Defender seems to be mostly signature based.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#114
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's better (and more efficient) to have a developer write (or waste, if you consider doing their job "wasting time") two interfaces than to waste the computer resources of a million people. Electron is just outsourcing cross platform development to the Chromium project.

Unfortunately waste of users' computer resources is an externality and developers are more expensive than ever. Revealed preferences show that customers would rather buy more hardware resources than pay higher prices for efficient software (within reasonable limits).

Then perhaps OS vendor should start thinking about unifying their UI SDK using web engines, because having to support the finicky toolkit of every OS is a waste of engineering time.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Almost as good as Mike Rowe .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_vs._MikeRoweSoft

It's strange to me that people still remember this. It's been 14 years, but I guess it's nice to be known for something :)

Hey, it still works: https://MikeRoweSoft.com

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#116
Have been using these tools for years. As essential as sysinternals. Would love to see some of his source code from which to learn. Everytime Im in a bind will turn to tools from this site, such as when forgot PST passwords on a 10 year old mail file. The networking and port tools have always been hugely useful. For context I work in a large global ISV, use Windows laptop, and travel often. Having Nir's utilities available has often enabled me to rescue myself from my own mistakes, or resolve things like networking. I too would be very happy if he would put up a donate button!

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#117

I'm confused why NirSoft software is not open source. I've always seen open source as easier than doing all the work on your own.

I'd imagine it cuts out the donation incentive, along with taking out a lot of the glory for creating items thousands of people use by yourself.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#118
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> most modern apple native apps are the ones that crash the most while electron are stable as... I'd hesitate to make this generalization. I need to use slack on a macbook for work and it crashes regularly. I tried out VS code and it also would crash on occasion. Worse than that, coworkers of mine have rolled bug-ridden electron apps that we're required to use. There are plenty of non-electron apps that are stable.

I'm on a mac and use slack an vscode. Neither has crashed on me. I'm wondering if there is something about your mac setup. I don't like that slack consumes some many resources. I love vscode so I don't care.

He is likely holding it wrong.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can probably shrink your icon down (losslessly) by dropping it into ImageOptim. https://imageoptim.com/mac

Or the command line util pngcrush

pngcrush is fairly old. And terribly unoptimized. If you want a command line solution, I recommend optipng (which does what pngcrush does, but better), and sending the result through advdef, which improves the compression even further.

...but really. ImageOptim is super awesome and zero-effort.

Re: NirSoft Freeware (2008)

#120
post #28
post #18

Nirsoft and Sysinternals should be part of Windows. Add Notepad++ and you have a decent OS all of a sudden.

I thought Sysinternals was acquired by Microsoft?

Mark went work for MS, as I recall. This was some years ago; I don't know about currently.

MS sucked in the tools/pages onto its domain. Navigation to/of their pages and versions became somewhat shittier (per the... "canonical" MS web experience, I guess). I seem to recall a bit of public pushback on this point, and things improved somewhat. Maybe I mis-recollect; I've been mostly away from Windows for quite a number of years, now.

Post reply on HN