Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a few centuries students in history classes will look back and try to understand why we let our people die in the streets.
Who is dying in the street in substantial numbers?
Sorry that it's all The Guardian but they had a series that I happened to remember, and I think that publication has a good enough reputation:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/15/america-extr...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/21/seques...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/01/un-extreme-pov...
Of course, if we find the slightest mistake or hyperbole (if there even is any) in an article or comment about the plight of the poor we can discuss THAT instead and dismiss the entire thought. Another form of bike-shedding, instead of using good faith for the discussion use every tiny opening of the "opponent" to sidetrack the discussion and to dismiss the issue.
So, where are the people of the masses of dying in the streets? None? Even in San Francisco they look shabby but very much still alive? Well, case closed I guess.