Live data from Hacker News

European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

eff.org

81–90 of 126 posts

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> globalists Did you mean actual globalists, or were you just using a racist dog-whistle to imply Jews?

Is that an actual question, or are you trying to deflect the valid criticisms of globalism by slandering it's opponents?

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#83
post #78
post #22

There was a previous discussion based on a similar article from Creative Commons a couple days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16810999 c3o (Christopher Clay), who works in the EU Parliament according to his profile, posted several informative comments including one explaining the backstory behind the proposed legislation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16812099 > The back story of the law may shed so…

I keep hearing Google News, but I can't see how and why people would use it frequently. Is anybody here using it? What for?

I check it most days as I like to skim a variety of international news sources in one list. I'd welcome suggestions of alternatives - especially if I could filter out the Daily Mail and other low quality sources.

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How will this effect google or facebook at all? Google and Facebook show titles and quotes of linked articles. This legislation is specifically aimed at them. Noncommercial actors (bloggers etc) are supposed to be exempt. > How do you NOT see this as bad? It is extremely frustrating how people on HN apparently have no ability to acknowledge a valid argument for a position they oppose. Read the last two paragraphs o…

> The latter is fundamental for a functioning democracy. But if distributors have to pay to link to such content, then such content will not contribute to a functioning democracy because nobody will be able to discover this content. And, it's funny you mention "functioning democracy" -- tell me how Brussels is part of a functioning democracy? The European Commission President and commissioners aren't elected are they…

Actually the majority of people in my country have a problem with that. It's hard to solve when your government is filled with "business"men taking EU dotations though.

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#85
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need to reveal who is managing the data in any case, which is separate from the DPO.

If you are this afraid to tell your customers and/or users your name, they are right not to trust you. ps -- if you want not to be required to disclose anything under the GDPR, don't collect any personal data. No ips, usernames, access logs, etc.

How do you do that, purely technically? That opens you up to even most basic attacks.

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#86
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is enforced no matter where in the world you are, as long as your site is accessible to EU citizens. And you will be surprised by how much jurisdiction European courts can have. A monetary judgement can be collected from any American company via UFMJRA, for example ( http://www.uniformlaws.org/ActSummary.aspx?title=Foreign%20M... ).

We’re not talking about a company, we’re talking about a fetish forum without a scrap of money changing hands. Who is enforcing GDPR there exactly? EU paratroopers? Not to mention that most people don’t live in the EU or America, so again, who’s enforcing this on our hypothetical non-business? It’s really hardcore levels of bullshit being employed in this thread to make a big scary mountain out of a molehill.

The EU could legally jail you the moment you step into its territory, and that includes flights that go through Europe, even without landing.

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#87
The underlaying question in this law is about estimating the monetary value of a piece of information and creating a market for selling information. As an example, here in Spain the master of Madrid Community's mayor has been deeply investigated, here that information has strong political implications, and produces monetary value for some political parties. A law can't be easily applied to Giants and ants, to huge actors and to individual bloggers, the model can't scale appropiately. So I would suggest just to impose a tax to huge actors and forget about creating a law that ranges from bloggers to google or twitter, those entities can't be measured with the same rule.

Googling about how to quantify in dollar the value of journalism, I found

1)http://mediashift.org/2016/10/much-investigative-journalism-... 2) The limits of quantification: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?ref...

3)https://www.amazon.com/Democracys-Detectives-Economics-Inves...

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#88
post #78
post #22

There was a previous discussion based on a similar article from Creative Commons a couple days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16810999 c3o (Christopher Clay), who works in the EU Parliament according to his profile, posted several informative comments including one explaining the backstory behind the proposed legislation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16812099 > The back story of the law may shed so…

I keep hearing Google News, but I can't see how and why people would use it frequently. Is anybody here using it? What for?

To prevent possible confusion, I should first note that there are several different ways users may find news articles via Google: in search results, suggested articles in mobile Chrome, articles in your Google feed (formerly Google Now), the Google Play Newsstand app (which unlike the others supports paid subscriptions), and probably others I'm forgetting.

In this case the subject is Google News: https://news.google.com

Personally, I use Google News because it's better at finding news I want to read than other aggregators (including other feeds from Google itself, at least for a while). The options to customize the topics I'm interested in and to block/prefer certain news sources are tremendously useful, while at same time it also brings up news from sources I haven't heard of before so I'm not limited to a handpicked selection.

Google News is also good for browsing articles from many different sources about a single news story. Most news cards show at least two, and you can expand the card and click "view full coverage" to bring up all the related articles. Makes it easy to peruse all the coverage.

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#89
post #83
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I keep hearing Google News, but I can't see how and why people would use it frequently. Is anybody here using it? What for?

I check it most days as I like to skim a variety of international news sources in one list. I'd welcome suggestions of alternatives - especially if I could filter out the Daily Mail and other low quality sources.

You can filter out the Daily Mail in Google News, too. Scroll down to "See news from your favorite sources" for how to block/prefer certain sources: https://support.google.com/news/answer/1146405

Re: European Copyright Law Could Soon Get Worse

#90
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it doesn't seem like you're trying too hard to assume good faith The same EU that regulated the shape of cucumbers? They regulated shapes of bananas. The EU also launched a kettle and toaster crackdown after the Brexit vote. [1] -- but hid those plans until after the vote. This is also the EU that hid plans to ban high powered kettles and toasters until after the Brexit vote so they wouldn't fuel the Leave campaign…

Ah, the old banana myth. How the EU forced banana producers to only produce or sell bananas with the right curvature. Only... that‘s not true. The EU defined quality classes for all kinds of products. And in the case of bananas these included curvature. Producers could still sell whatever curved bananas they liked. At whatever price they liked. They just couldn‘t claim it conformed to this specific quality class. Bec…

Also, the EU didn't invent the idea of quality classes for produce - they already existed in most EU countries, because they are genuinely useful (primarily for wholesale buyers, who benefit from knowing more exactly what they'll get). The class definitions just varied from one country to the next, which was a massive pain for producers wanting to sell internationally - so the idea was that every EU country would agree on a common set of classes, making things simpler for everyone involved.
Post reply on HN