The murder that shook Iceland
theguardian.com
The murder that shook Iceland
1–10 of 76 posts
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#2I wonder why...
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#3Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#4>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#5>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#6>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#7>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#8>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...
Probably the usual reasons. Homogeneity, social cohesion... These are probably not universally correlated with low crime but they certainly tend to be.
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably the usual reasons. Homogeneity, social cohesion... These are probably not universally correlated with low crime but they certainly tend to be.
How do you measure social cohesion? Crime rate might be one way, but then you've got yourself a tautology.
EDIT: Downvotes? For this?
I'm not claiming that lacking the diversity is a good thing, merely that having extra options decreases cohesion. The more diverse the economic situation is (say, due to vast wealth inequality) the less cohesion there is. The more diverse the religions are, the less common-ground people have based on religion--as in most of European history. The more racially diverse a place is, the more tensions due to race (LA versus Helsinki).
Is it worth the hit to cohesion to have better diversity? I'd argue that, in the absence of external threats, it absolutely is. But living in a fantasyland where diversity doesn't come at the expense of cohesion doesn't help.
Re: The murder that shook Iceland
#10>a country with one of the lowest murder rates in the world I wonder why...