@off: Mr. Hatch seems like a really smart man.
Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
71–80 of 487 posts
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#72Mark Zuckerberg does not believe he has a monopoly. He believes there is an alternative to Facebook in the way that different car manufacturers have different competitors. Surely he can't mean this, right?
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#73MZ: "You control and own the content you post on Facebook" Something seems just a tad bit disingenuous about this.
"Nobody forces you to post drunken racist rants on your wall or dickpics on Instagram. You control and own the content you post on Facebook."
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#74Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#75I would not be surprised if Zuckerberg were given a script of certain senators questions prior to this hearing. A majority of the questioning seems targeted at inspiring consumer confidence in facebook. This isn't about serving the American people, this is about protecting corporation's ability to sell citizens personal data.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#76Is it just me, or does he sound condescending every time he responds, like he's educating a subordinate he's frustrated with.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#77Mark Zuckerberg does not believe he has a monopoly. He believes there is an alternative to Facebook in the way that different car manufacturers have different competitors. Surely he can't mean this, right?
Is that no longer true?
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#78Mark Zuckerberg does not believe he has a monopoly. He believes there is an alternative to Facebook in the way that different car manufacturers have different competitors. Surely he can't mean this, right?
He bought Instagram because they are talented developers, not because they are a competitor. /sarcasm
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#79"Is it true facebook can track user browsers even after they are logged out of facebook?" Zuck: "I need to get back to you on that"
Zuck knows this is generally feasible - he's a talented software engineer. The question was ambiguously worded, and Zuck could have clarified or answered that it's generally feasible but that Facebook has tight controls around the usage of that information. It's the panel's responsibility to not let him get away with that type of maneuver, and they don't have the type of real-time support that, say, a news anchor has (with earpiece and live research staff) to handle interviewing domain experts in an optimal way.