I love this idea, but my two "deal breaker" worries are: (a) data backup, and (b) security. I hate that this is the case, but when comparing a "box-at-home" vs. a "corporate-run service", the corporate-run service is less likely to lose my data and more likely to apply security patches and updates ASAP. Even with 0days and all of the "hackers stole millions of users' data" posts, think the point remains strong; altho…
re: (b) Security Security through delegation vs security through obscurity imo here, follow simple things like use non-standard ports and your changes of getting hacked are likely shockingly low even if your behind on patches.
FreedomBox
21–30 of 65 posts
Re: FreedomBox
#22Seriously though, software isn't the issue here, hardware is. Anybody with the skills can slap Linux on an old computer and turn it into a server. It's packaging it up into something you can sell to the non-technical that's the real win.
I wish free software advocates would take more lessons from Jobs instead of blindly idealizing Woz.
Re: FreedomBox
#23Yay, another distro. /s Seriously though, software isn't the issue here, hardware is. Anybody with the skills can slap Linux on an old computer and turn it into a server. It's packaging it up into something you can sell to the non-technical that's the real win. I wish free software advocates would take more lessons from Jobs instead of blindly idealizing Woz.
They are focusing on exactly what you are saying, putting together a UI that non-technicals can use.
Re: FreedomBox
#24I keep an eye on the project, though I haven't tried setting one up so far. I have to say it's a little sad to see that the Contribute link in the site footer throws a 403 (I'd report that to them, but so does the Contact link...)
Re: FreedomBox
#25I know that sacrifices some end-user control philosophically, but in reality it would greatly increase it for those in the great majority who currently have none.
Re: FreedomBox
#26Yay, another distro. /s Seriously though, software isn't the issue here, hardware is. Anybody with the skills can slap Linux on an old computer and turn it into a server. It's packaging it up into something you can sell to the non-technical that's the real win. I wish free software advocates would take more lessons from Jobs instead of blindly idealizing Woz.
Re: FreedomBox
#27What a suitable privacy agreement this could work online--and I'd be okay trusting a contractual agreement to keep my data safe.
Re: FreedomBox
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
re: (b) Security Security through delegation vs security through obscurity imo here, follow simple things like use non-standard ports and your changes of getting hacked are likely shockingly low even if your behind on patches.
nmap, a standard pen tool, already sees through port mapping and other convenient obscurity tricks, there's just nothing like actually keeping your system up to date
Re: FreedomBox
#29Re: FreedomBox
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am technical and I struggle to find a use for my home server. The most common uses I always find are: - Media server: I primarily use streaming services or physical media - File sharing: I rarely ever share files between computers, and if I need to, I just scp them on my home network. - Web hosting: box is too small/old to reliably do this, plus I have cloud hosting already I do use it for private SVN and have plan…
I think the key would be to embed it to some existing appliance; like a router, game console, or other "always-on" and connected device. I don't see the home server being the prime selling point. Everyone needs a router, so if you created a router that was dead simple to configure and use, had some cool extra features, integrated well with your home gadgets ("Alexa, turn off the WiFi", "Alexa, setup a guest wifi netw…