I don’t understand all this talk about “connections” made in 4 year colleges, as if that’s a good thing. Isn’t it intensely anti-meritocratic and something to be discouraged, not encouraged?
Developing a network of peers IS a good thing!
> Isn’t it intensely anti-meritocratic
I guess that depends on how yo define "merit".
The ability to build professional networks is actually a valuable skill, not just for the individual but also for the business. And the network itself is valuable.
I can think of three of reasons why a business would, on merit alone, prefer someone with demonstrated ability to build their professional network, or who is plugged into a particular professional network:
1. When it comes to hiring, "merit" does not mean "the best person"! "Merit" means "someone who can do the job and who we can convince to take the job given recruiting budget X and max comp package Y." If locating a candidate among the chafe costs more than "X", then that candidate ISN'T a meritorious candidate. No matter who good they would be at the job!
2. Businesses often recruit to access to an entire network/pipeline, not just a single engineer. This is a common pattern at lower-paying shops especially. Recruiting your Nth engineer from State U is easy because you already have recruit N-1 to give you the names of five people who would probably do well. Now, in any given year, the business could recruit zero people from State U. But then they have to rebuild their State U pipeline in subsequent years.
In other words, your network is part of the value you provide to the company! Someone with no professional network is strictly less valuable than someone with a professional network. And in some regional job markets, "Alumni of State U" is a valuable recruiting network.
3. Someone with a strong professional network has signaled that they have a modicum of skill at "winning hearts and minds". Depending on the shop, engineers who are good at building and maintaining reputation over the long term bring way more value than just the LoCs they commit during their period of employment.
4. It's also worth pointing out that someone you recruit via one of these networks might have a niche combination of skills that would be otherwise hard to discover. E.g., "oh, we're hiring a new dev to work with a new client in industry XYZ. I have an old friend who double majored in CS and ABC, which gives him the background needed to talk with folks in industry XYZ. Should I give him a call?". Again, the definition of "merit" is "we can find you with budget X and you're willing to do the work for comp package Y". NOT "you're the ideal candidate if we had X+Z recruiting budget to cast a wide net and find you"
All that said, hiring college buddies can be anti-meritocratic, for sure. Life isn't fair. Just one of the reasons colleges require freshman read Shakespeare :)