1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service • Hacker News Board

Re: 1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

#691

Post by ksk » Fri, Apr 06, 2018, 8:11 PM UTC

hueving wrote: post #684

ksk wrote: post #681

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>That's irrelevant when we are talking about a company being paid specifically to audit something. The entire world is able to send me food as well, but I don't get mad when it doesn't except for when I pay someone to do it. Linux is developed almost exclusively by people who get paid for their work. Billions of dollars of real money has been poured by IBM, Intel, RH, etc. You are thoroughly confused my friend. Lets…

>Linux is developed almost exclusively by people who get paid for their work. Billions of dollars of real money has been poured by IBM, Intel, RH, etc. You are thoroughly confused my friend. Lets stick with the original point. What aren't you getting? Developing is not auditing. KPMG wasn't paid to do banking, they were just paid to audit. >So explain how they audited the firm, explain which data they had access to a…

Sorry, don't want to waste my time any further. Its obvious to me that you have zero actual evidence, and no knowledge of what was done, or what was overlooked. Goodbye.

Re: 1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

#692

Post by cthalupa » Sun, Apr 08, 2018, 9:53 AM UTC

fudgy73 wrote: post #473

cthalupa wrote: post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should invest in some better wifi gear, it sounds like! On a Unifi nano hd, with moderate signal, my latency only goes up 1ms. Getting ~3.5 ms on wifi to 1.1.1.1, ~2.5ms ethernet

Out of curiosity, what is your complete Unifi / network setup?

GW/Firewall: USG-XG Switches: 2x US-16-XG, 1x US-48, 2x US-8 APs: 2x Nano HD, 2x AC Pro

Re: 1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

#693

Post by eric_lu » Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 2:44 PM UTC

how do i ping

Re: 1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

#694

Post by Andre_Wanglin » Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 6:34 PM UTC

18pfsmt wrote: post #675

Andre_Wanglin wrote: post #515

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, you have the CloudFlare blog where Prince states "The tipping point for us making this decision was that the team behind Daily Stormer made the claim that we were secretly supporters of their ideology."[0] So, all that is necessary is to find this statement. I won't link to it but the Daily Stormer has been active on the clear web for most of the time intervening the seizure of their domain and now. Prince neve…

You seem to know an awful lot about this specific case, and I'll defer to you on that. I know about the general case, technically speaking (though merely a DNS hobbyist). However, having a business relationship with another organization is not a right. Hate speakers are not a protected class. DNS does not operate in the same manner nor with the same assumptions. One can obviously run their own DNS resolver as has bee…

>Please list the, "pro-pedophilia and ISIS web sites." hosted by Cloudflare?

It's in the linked archived DS article and I confirmed the information is still true.

Re: 1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

#695

Post by visitante » Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 11:33 PM UTC

wila wrote: post #234

ancarda wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://developers.cloudflare.com/1.1.1.1/setting-up-1.1.1.1... 2606:4700:4700::1111 2606:4700:4700::1001 Not as memorable, unfortunately.

2606:4700:4700::1111 You could make it slightly more memorable by decoding from hex to ascii, but that does not help too much either in this case: & ACK:G NUL: G NUL::1111

.