Live data from Hacker News

What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

sapiens.org

491–500 of 557 posts

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#491

For 22 years I used toilet paper until I traveled to South East Asia where every toilet has a seperate sprinkler. After a few toilet visits I decided to give it a GO. Man, toilet paper feels strange and plain stupid now. Water is way cheaper, doesn't hurt your "behind" and I feel cleaner afterwards. Paper seems an invention to sell something we really don't need (by Mad Men :-)).

I'd be afraid of the sprinkler collecting fecal and other matter, and am not too eager to nebulize that onto my behind.

The $300 add-on unit I have does self-cleaning after every use. When the sprayer retracts, it again sprays, but since there is now plastic directly above it, it cleans off the sprayer head on the rebound.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#492

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you get them from the stall to the trash?

You must be talking about a public toilet? I think most "normal" or home toilet routines go out the window when using a public restroom.

I don't think throwing them out of the window is the answer either.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#493

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not everyone has messy shit. I often have literally nothing on the toilet paper. Increase your vegetables, and fiber.

depends on how furry your butt is. I have the south asian furry butt curse.

Nah, just doesn't come out all sticky. Definitely a hairy ass.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#494
post #484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt it has literally nothing on it. You can eat nothing but fiber, but bowel mucous is still dirty.

Haven't you ever done a shit that when you wipe there's nothing on the toilet paper?

Nothing visually, I don't consider the paper clean.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#495

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plumbing wasn't designed for them in most places. Most of them are not really "flushable" like they claim.

That's because people use "face wipes" instead of "wet wipes" meant to be used for the bum.

No. Not really. flushable bum wipes are not really flushable.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#496

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plumbing wasn't designed for them in most places. Most of them are not really "flushable" like they claim.

That's because people use "face wipes" instead of "wet wipes" meant to be used for the bum.

Nope. At least from all the articles I have seen from different waste treatment plants in America. Those wipes that are advertised as flushable don't breakdown that much and they just end up getting pulled out at the waste treatment plant.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#499

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you get them from the stall to the trash?

you bundle it like a paper basketball and shoot it from the stall.

Boy was my aim way off! Will have to put some more work in on my sky-hook.

Re: What Did Ancient Romans Do Without Toilet Paper?

#500

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's because people use "face wipes" instead of "wet wipes" meant to be used for the bum.

No. Not really. flushable bum wipes are not really flushable.

What? You can't say "no" to an entire line of products. Simply make sure that you buy wipes that are flushable AND biodegradable. Flushable simply means that the wipe will make it out of your home. You also need to live in a country where there are rules in place stopping manufacturer from lying on the packets.

If they are made of, let's say, viscose rayon which is wood pulp (well, any compatible plant fiber) there's no reason why it would clog anything at the processing plant.

Edit: Well, it would also depend on how your local plant processes waste. Give them a call and ask them.

Post reply on HN