The Touchbar has been mostly a dud for me, and I don't miss it when using my older MBP. I have customized by touch bar to include my favorite actions such as locking the screen, but it is otherwise static. My 2 biggest issues are: - It turns off after 1 min of inactivity, and find it infuriating that I have to wake it up by before using it. Effectively making everything 2 interactions away. - No haptic feedback. Even…
Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
121–130 of 477 posts
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#122The big problem I see is that my laptop is hooked up to a display half the time, lid closed. It wouldn’t be useful for showing anything that isn’t also on the main display. And it can’t have a set of bar-only controls (if Apple were serious about that use, they would have released an external keyboard with Touch Bar by now).
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#123Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can make the Caps Lock key even more useful by turning it into a "Hyper" modifier (Command+Ctrl+Option+Shift) when it is held down (great for system-wide shortcuts in Hammerspoon[0], since application shortcuts that use all four modifiers are very rare) but acts like pressing "Escape" when it is tapped . This is easily done with Karabiner Elements[1] and a simple rule[2] you import and enable. [0] http://www.hamm…
Do you happen to know how to do that on a linux machine running X? I'm afraid to dive back into the xkb rule hell-hole to figure it out myself.
handles part of it and
xcape -e 'Caps_Lock=Escape'
does the rest. xcape is in the ubuntu repos, for fedora there's a copr (dawid/xcape).
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can make the Caps Lock key even more useful by turning it into a "Hyper" modifier (Command+Ctrl+Option+Shift) when it is held down (great for system-wide shortcuts in Hammerspoon[0], since application shortcuts that use all four modifiers are very rare) but acts like pressing "Escape" when it is tapped . This is easily done with Karabiner Elements[1] and a simple rule[2] you import and enable. [0] http://www.hamm…
Do you happen to know how to do that on a linux machine running X? I'm afraid to dive back into the xkb rule hell-hole to figure it out myself.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like a great application for an e-ink display. No burn-in, low power, and can always emit as much light as the keys on the keyboard do (by front-illuminating the bar when the keyboard backlight is on).
The 2014 ThinkPad X1 Carbon had an e-ink touch strip instead of an F-row (exactly like the MBP does). It didn’t work very well: poor display contrast, hard to see in bright daylight, can’t feel for keys, slow response time, etc. They switched back to real keys for the 2015 model release. ...that’s why Apple’s adoption of it surprised me the most: I saw how it on the ThinkPad added no value, and while Apple has greate…
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#127I’m a non-tech savvy person who happens to work in tech. I find the touch bar very useful. This is what I believe: the touchbar is for people like me... people who never learned to use the F keys, people who aren’t obsessive about shortcuts but appreciate them when discovered. In short, it’s for the 90% of software users that float between general public and pro users. It works.
> In short, it’s for the 90% of software users that float between general public and pro users. It works. Then they should have not called it a “MacBook pro” there is nothing “pro” about touch bar, it’s something useless that I have to pay extra for and I don’t need it at all.
Because I use vi.
Because I am a professional and theoretically the target audience of $3,000 premium quality laptops.
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#128I wonder if haptics will ever be good enough that we'll have a purely touchscreen keyboard that doesn't suck.
> a purely touchscreen keyboard that doesn't suck Many people would consider an iPhone keyboard to be this…
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#129I’m a non-tech savvy person who happens to work in tech. I find the touch bar very useful. This is what I believe: the touchbar is for people like me... people who never learned to use the F keys, people who aren’t obsessive about shortcuts but appreciate them when discovered. In short, it’s for the 90% of software users that float between general public and pro users. It works.
I know a LOT of people who are not tech savvy and still could write without looking at their keyboard. (p.s. there were devices who had a keyboard before computers even existed and people learned to use them without looking every second at the typewriter/keyboard)
So basically the touch bar basically removes that flow completly
Re: Making the Touch Bar useful by abandoning Apple guidelines
#130The biggest problem with touchbar is that Apple intentionally made non-touchbar model inferior in terms of hardware and the amount of USB-C ports to make sure ppl buy touchbar. This is truly infuriating and I'm sure, was done for purely marketing reasons. I'd buy a non-touchbar model if it had the same hardware as a touchbar model in a heartbeat.