This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
(I'll refrain from making a joke about all the Russian bots that really have nothing better to do.)
11–20 of 405 posts
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
(I'll refrain from making a joke about all the Russian bots that really have nothing better to do.)
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
(It's amazing how many things can go wrong and hurt you.)
> An audiologist friend told me to go to an ENT physician if not better by 48 hours or the damage could be permanent. Much longer than that and it would be too late to try any of the interventions This seems like poor advice. If there is significant, realistic concern about permanent damage, I'd suggest checking immediately, rather than give it extra time...
Yes, I always find it amazing how patients can have a sudden sensorineural hearing loss and wait days before presenting. In my opinion patients and the public should treat it as urgently as a sudden sight loss. High dose steroids are regularly prescribed in this sort of scenario in an attempt to minimize damage, and are likely to be more effective the sooner they are given.
It puts me in mind of the Cuban embassy thing...
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
I actually thought it was easier to read in this form. I can't be bothered with articles that have too much padding.
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
This is a neat story, but I continue to wonder why people use "tweetstorms" to write long-form stuff like that.
If this causes people to write more concise stories, I'm all for it! On a page like the linked one, you can still read it like an article, and it doesn't have too much superfluous content.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually thought it was easier to read in this form. I can't be bothered with articles that have too much padding.
I think I like features like "paragraphs" that are not possible in this form.