Live data from Hacker News

It's time to head back to RSS?

wired.com

11–20 of 503 posts

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#11
Have been using https://inoreader.com since the Year Google Reader closed, and imho, it's better than Feedly.

I'm also usually reading HN via my full-text feed. Meaning, I don't have to load a link every time, I focus on the articles first, and I can easily pre-load everything for offline reading on mobile.

I think, in case of RSS such online services are superior to self-hosted solutions - whether server or client - as there is a greater chance someone is already aggregating a feed you might discover only some time in the future.

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#12
I'm interested in a reader that focuses on efficiency; like probably most people, no matter how much I try to cull them I end up with too many items in my list, more than I have time for.

Let's say it takes an average of 2.5 seconds to read a feed item subject line, decide whether to read it[0], and nothing else - not opening or reading any articles. In half an hour of concentration you could do that with ~700 feed items - again, without reading one article. Let's call 700 feed items a generous maximum; I doubt many will want to devote 30 minutes of their day only to reviewing feed items.

I end up with far more than 700 and I know I'm not the only one. How can I make it faster?

1. Obviously, the UI must not slow me down in any way.

2. Deduplication

3. Grouping of feed items covering the same topic. There may be dozens of items covering the march last weekend: If I don't want to read about it, I can ignore them en masse. If I do want to read about it, I can select the best looking feed item from the group and ignore the rest.

4. Display summaries instead of articles, at least optionally. If an item interests me, I can read the RSS summary and possibly save reading full articles that don't interest me or for which the summary contains the info I want.

... Is there a reader that does all that? Even if I have to pay for it? And it's still not enough; I doubt I could efficiently process all the items using only above. What else can be done?

[0] Source: I just timed myself doing that with 10 feed items in 26 seconds

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#14
I built a tiny website back in 2005-ish to aggregate RSS feeds from sites that I was interested in. Just for myself and didn't think too much that it could have been an actual product. That was before Google Reader launching in October 2005. Today it's sad to see Google Reader discontinued.

Somehow I find this article very interesting in that it's kind of a sandwich that the promotion of Feedly is inserted in the middle, which makes me wonder if the article really wants to advocate the revival of RSS, or is just another marketing one. Does anyone have the same feeling here (confusing face)?

Edited: fixed a typo: Google Reader launched in October 2005.

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#15
post #14

I built a tiny website back in 2005-ish to aggregate RSS feeds from sites that I was interested in. Just for myself and didn't think too much that it could have been an actual product. That was before Google Reader launching in October 2005. Today it's sad to see Google Reader discontinued. Somehow I find this article very interesting in that it's kind of a sandwich that the promotion of Feedly is inserted in the mid…

[deleted]

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#17
Syndicated feeds (whether RSS or ATOM) are fabulous and are by far the best way to aggregate a wide variety of sources with a minimum of corporate surveillance. There aren't many that don't emit RSS/Atom or can't be coerced in some way (even Twitter with services such as https://twitrss.me/)

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#18
I implemented RSS on FWD:Everyone this past week (not deployed yet). It was super easy, didn't take more than a couple hours, and only required two or three extra lines of code for each endpoint.

I have no idea how much use it will get, but seemed like an important thing to.

Re: It's time to head back to RSS?

#20

Have been using https://inoreader.com since the Year Google Reader closed, and imho, it's better than Feedly. I'm also usually reading HN via my full-text feed. Meaning, I don't have to load a link every time, I focus on the articles first, and I can easily pre-load everything for offline reading on mobile. I think, in case of RSS such online services are superior to self-hosted solutions - whether server or client -…

What makes it better than Feedly? I've been using Feedly since Google Reader closed and I think it pretty much nails this simple tool. How is it even possible to be much better?
Post reply on HN