Darn, no IPv6 address?
>For IPv6: 2001:2001::, 2001:2001:2001::
31–40 of 253 posts
Darn, no IPv6 address?
>For IPv6: 2001:2001::, 2001:2001:2001::
This is awesome to hear, and for all of the criticism Cloudflare has gotten in the past, they have spoken loudly against censorship, not just for people they like, but those they dislike as well. I'd much rather point my DNS at them than Google, an ad company where tracking is the whole business model.
Really? Didn't the CEO kick stormfront off Cloudflare because they thought they were assholes?
The concerning thing about this is that internet is increasingly dependent on Cloudflare, making it a single point of failure and exploitation. Somehow, people are not talking much about it, but a significant amount of sites have opted in for Cloudflare proxying, allowing it to see the traffic in plain text, while the visitors are made to believe that the connection is secure. Similarly, users will now use their fast…
How does a company like Cloudflare come to acquire a "vanity" IP address like that? Are they just sold privately to high bidders?
The concerning thing about this is that internet is increasingly dependent on Cloudflare, making it a single point of failure and exploitation. Somehow, people are not talking much about it, but a significant amount of sites have opted in for Cloudflare proxying, allowing it to see the traffic in plain text, while the visitors are made to believe that the connection is secure. Similarly, users will now use their fast…
To me that’s a diversification away from 8.8.8.8. I am absolutely not criticising google’s DNS, it’s a useful service. But I am happy to get more choice.
Is that specific? sure, but I'll tell you when I go to set a new system up I'm going to type 8.8.8.8 because it's what comes to my mind.
How does a company like Cloudflare come to acquire a "vanity" IP address like that? Are they just sold privately to high bidders?
> Cloudflare had the network. APNIC had the IP address (1.1.1.1). Both of us were motivated by a mission to help build a better Internet. You can read more about each organization’s motivations on our respective posts: Cloudflare Blog / APNIC Blog.
The blog post links just links to the blog themselves, not actually to a post, so this submission seems premature.
The concerning thing about this is that internet is increasingly dependent on Cloudflare, making it a single point of failure and exploitation. Somehow, people are not talking much about it, but a significant amount of sites have opted in for Cloudflare proxying, allowing it to see the traffic in plain text, while the visitors are made to believe that the connection is secure. Similarly, users will now use their fast…
They booted the daily stormer, knowing full well the ramifications:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/
"Get out of the way so we can DDoS this site off the Internet."
This is awesome to hear, and for all of the criticism Cloudflare has gotten in the past, they have spoken loudly against censorship, not just for people they like, but those they dislike as well. I'd much rather point my DNS at them than Google, an ad company where tracking is the whole business model.
IPv6, other debate.
The website at 1.1.1.1 isn't running, but the DNS service seems to be operating.