Earlier quoted context omitted.
Conversely, it makes running an opposition campaign so easy that the opposition won't need to focus on the big issues. The opposition could focus on morality and pay lip-service to neoliberal diversity theatre while simultaneously selling out to corporate interests. If you're running against Trump in an election, what's the point of drawing the ire of industry (pharma, insurance, military, surveillance, general big-c…
> The opposition could focus on morality and pay lip-service to neoliberal diversity theatre while simultaneously selling out to corporate interests. Pretty sure any phrase preceded by the word 'neoliberal' is already (by definition) aligned with corporate interests. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism "Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism refers primarily to the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas assoc…
U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
311–320 of 439 posts
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#312To all immigrants who went to the US on such a visa (e.g. H1) - take this as a distant warning and make a plan B to leave the US. This story does not have a good ending and it has happened too often in history. There may be a lot of native folks wringing their hands and even offering their support (which is welcome of course) but the underclass is generally too economically ignorant to ever listen to them.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#313So will this be the case for ESTA visas too?
Therefore if the social media details become a requirement for visa applications only, then ESTA would theoretically be exempt. Having said that, social media is currently an optional field on the ESTA form so the foundation has been laid.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#314Pretty absurd that they're asking for all of this and: > [...] In addition to their social media histories, visa applicants will be asked for five years of previously used telephone numbers, email addresses, international travel and deportation status, as well as whether any family members have been involved in terrorist activities. I know a number of people going through, or have been through, the US visa process an…
Which I think is an interesting admission they have all the calls stored somewhere so they can check them for content...
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#315But thanks to gerrymandering, your vote will very likely be moot. So that has to be fixed first.
(This was a reply that appears to have become stranded.)
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
Conversely, it makes running an opposition campaign so easy that the opposition won't need to focus on the big issues. The opposition could focus on morality and pay lip-service to neoliberal diversity theatre while simultaneously selling out to corporate interests. If you're running against Trump in an election, what's the point of drawing the ire of industry (pharma, insurance, military, surveillance, general big-c…
The entire Russia collusion thing is to take peoples attention away from dnc's burning of Bernie and other actions. I would urge people to read the WikiLeaks emails once and see what's in their. Its truly damning. Also if there were an actual collusion then one of those "17 intelligence agencies" and the senate intelligence committee or Mueller probe would have revealed in a year. Unless you admit Trump is a total Ge…
hey look, recommendations to read propaganda from a green account.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#317I like living here, but christ it's just not worth it. I'm sick of the rabid anti-immigrant bullshit.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#318People I've spoken to seem more comfortable acting like this is part of the current administration's agenda, rather than an encroaching trend which has been gradually getting worse year upon year. For example this specific policy was added as an "optional" (not really) question on an entry form before the 2016 presidential elections (I know, I wrote a letter protesting it during public comment period). My point is: B…
Well, the US political structure was designed to make such things happen.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
One nice thing about having a President with 50%+ disapproval [1] is all the things that got swept under the rug, previously, can now be made alarming. This might be an unintended way the system clears detritus and scope creep. [1] https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/...
Isn't it always the case that the President has "disapproval" ratings around 50% though? Half the country tends to like the person they voted for, and half the country has sour grapes because their side lost. Obama's disapproval ratings also hovered above 50% at several points in his Presidency [1]. So it isn't Trump's "disapproval" ratings that are new for any President, it's the level of hatred that the press has f…
Trump is historically unpopular.
Re: U.S. To Seek Social Media Details from All Visa Applicants
#320Earlier quoted context omitted.
can now be made alarming This is wrong in so many levels, and explains exactly how we got here. You're judging the issue not by its own weight, but by who is going to deal with it, or not.
A counterargument: our system (in the US) is representative . That is, we elect individuals who are empowered to represent us as they see fit. This is subtly different than electing delegates who we expect to carry out our will indirectly. In a representative system, the "who" is, and is intended to be, important.
Where is the representative government?