Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a very anti-intellectual approach to dialog. It explicitly ignores the logic of the argument being made. It disqualifies any language containing words that are allegedly associated with some ideological perspective from even being considered. It creates an ideological echo chamber, as it is completely intolerant to any view that even hints at falling outside of it. If you do utilize such heuristics, at least don…
Ignoring people is part of life; I’m not interested in every random I come across on the net taking up a little corner of my head. My goal isn’t intellectual purity, it’s living my life. Fortunately though, as your argument(s) seems to be largely logic-free, it turns out to be very helpful. I can understand why being dismissed without the hearing you want is frustrating, but I don’t know you and don’t care.
You're not simply ignoring a party at that point. You're promoting a pretty extreme form of ideological intolerance, where merely using a particular word is enough to make a snap judgement about a person's entire argument.
>>Fortunately though, as your argument(s) seems to be largely logic-free, it turns out to be very helpful.
Trying to insult me like this is not mature at all.