Live data from Hacker News

Scribd is now the largest Rails site on the Internet (using Alexa rankings)

rails100.pbwiki.com

1–10 of 32 posts

Re: Scribd is now the largest Rails site on the Internet (using Alexa rankings)

#3
Scribd is growing quickly and actively hiring all kinds of developers (ruby on rails, flash/actionscript, C++, etc) so please contact us, hackers@scribd.com, if you're interested. Check out our jobs page here: http://www.scribd.com/static/jobs

Here's a link to our traffic graph on alexa:

http://snipurl.com/24rqq

Re: Scribd is now the largest Rails site on the Internet (using Alexa rankings)

#4

yeah, this is using alexa rankings, so it's far from perfect and misses a lot of other data, so take it for what it's worth.

Alexa did a major update to it's ranking algorithm and source data yesterday. It's supposedly a lot better.

Re: Scribd is now the largest Rails site on the Internet (using Alexa rankings)

#9
post #6

The first time I used Scribd's iPaper I thought, "This is magic." Its one of those products that, as a web developer, you'd have to be stupid not to use. Its simply that much better than its competitors. Congratulations, guys.

Can you explain the magic? I just don't get it. (Maybe I am stupid; I'll admit that much.)

From what I've seen, it looks like a Flash plugin to view PDFs. It breaks my scroll-wheel and keyboard shortcuts, uses funny-looking controls, and it takes as long to load the Flash plugin as it would have to just load the whole PDF. I always edit the URL so I can view the PDF normally. I don't know why I'd want to do this to my users.

Re: Scribd is now the largest Rails site on the Internet (using Alexa rankings)

#10
post #9
post #6

The first time I used Scribd's iPaper I thought, "This is magic." Its one of those products that, as a web developer, you'd have to be stupid not to use. Its simply that much better than its competitors. Congratulations, guys.

Can you explain the magic? I just don't get it. (Maybe I am stupid; I'll admit that much.) From what I've seen, it looks like a Flash plugin to view PDFs. It breaks my scroll-wheel and keyboard shortcuts, uses funny-looking controls, and it takes as long to load the Flash plugin as it would have to just load the whole PDF. I always edit the URL so I can view the PDF normally. I don't know why I'd want to do this to m…

doesn't in-browser pdf viewing suck apart from safari?
Post reply on HN