Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tyson is intellectually underwhelming and doesn't seem to understand the limitations of his own knowledge. He's made his fame for speaking with the mannerisms of a preacher; and for remaking (in science a necessity) the Carl Sagan classic. He's already being forgotten by mainstream culture, which is not worse for it.
> He's already being forgotten by mainstream culture, which is not worse for it. I disagree. Out of all pop-sci educators there's three that just about everyone who likes science knows: NDT, Bill Nye, and Carl Sagan.
Stephen Hawking has died
461–468 of 468 posts
Re: Stephen Hawking has died
#462Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree completely. Who will take his place? Who will be the Stephen Hawking of my children's generation? As a society we should work hard to find, celebrate and give a platform to the Stephen Hawking-s and the Carl Sagan-s of tomorrow. The impact of such "celebrity scientists" (I do not use that term pejoratively) is far greater than the measure of the work they have done. It is how they inspire an entire generation…
Neil Degrasse Tyson is clearly vying for the slot but seems to make science seem more elitist, more pedantic (read literally any of his tweets) and thus appears to miss the point entirely
I think Mr. Tyson is a phony. He does not deserve, nor does he know how, to bring science to the "masses".
Re: Stephen Hawking has died
#463I accidentally ate Stephen Hawking's lunch once at a conference at Caltech.
Please explain more...
It turns out that despite his physical limitations he actually did eat normal solid foods. This was in 2011.
Re: Stephen Hawking has died
#464Re: Stephen Hawking has died
#465Re: Stephen Hawking has died
#466-- Stephen Hawking