Live data from Hacker News

Congrats Dropbox

blog.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 285 posts

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#22
I think the caption "The Summer 2017 Y Combinator Batch – Jessica Sitting with Dropbox Cofounder, Arash" for the image should be 2007? Or am I wrong?

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#23

I like Dropbox and YCombinator, but this line near the end was odd: "Today is a big milestone for YC. When we launched 13 years ago, we never imagined that a company that we’d funded would one day go public." Really? What were they doing funding it, then? I hadn't realized that wasn't the original idea at YCombinator.

You don't need to have an IPO to be a successful venture??

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#24
post #20

This is nice from a business-perspective. But, stepping back ... I'm sure that a lot of the folks here would agree that something as basic as file-sync should be a standard part of any OS, and follow a non-proprietary protocol. So whereas they have turned something that should have been a commodity into a profitable business, I'm not sure what we have achieved here.

It pretty much is a standard part of the OS. iCloud, OneDrive, etc.

It's the "non-proprietary" part you're not ever going to see. Someone has to pay for storage.

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#26
Don't forget that Condoleezza Rice, a driving instrument in the War on Iraq and the death of a million Iraqis, sits today on the board of Dropbox.

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#27
post #24
post #20

This is nice from a business-perspective. But, stepping back ... I'm sure that a lot of the folks here would agree that something as basic as file-sync should be a standard part of any OS, and follow a non-proprietary protocol. So whereas they have turned something that should have been a commodity into a profitable business, I'm not sure what we have achieved here.

It pretty much is a standard part of the OS. iCloud, OneDrive, etc. It's the "non-proprietary" part you're not ever going to see. Someone has to pay for storage.

Why would non-proprietary preclude paying for storage?

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#28
post #24
post #20

This is nice from a business-perspective. But, stepping back ... I'm sure that a lot of the folks here would agree that something as basic as file-sync should be a standard part of any OS, and follow a non-proprietary protocol. So whereas they have turned something that should have been a commodity into a profitable business, I'm not sure what we have achieved here.

It pretty much is a standard part of the OS. iCloud, OneDrive, etc. It's the "non-proprietary" part you're not ever going to see. Someone has to pay for storage.

Don't be so sure -- IPFS provides a possible path. We will see if it works.

Re: Congrats Dropbox

#30
post #24
post #20

This is nice from a business-perspective. But, stepping back ... I'm sure that a lot of the folks here would agree that something as basic as file-sync should be a standard part of any OS, and follow a non-proprietary protocol. So whereas they have turned something that should have been a commodity into a profitable business, I'm not sure what we have achieved here.

It pretty much is a standard part of the OS. iCloud, OneDrive, etc. It's the "non-proprietary" part you're not ever going to see. Someone has to pay for storage.

It's the protocol that's non-proprietary, not the service. IP is non-proprietary but you still have to pay for servers.
Post reply on HN